Yesterday marked the end of our 14-day review period for our draft comments on PICDRP. During the review period, one BC member (Ron Andruff) noted appreciation for the draft. No concerns or objections were raised in email or on the BC member call held 17-Oct. Therefore the comment was finalized and filed with ICANN today. (attached) Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for their research and drafting on these comments. From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Friday, October 11, 2013 9:24 PM To: "bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>" <bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Cc: "Hansen, Anjali" <AHansen@council.bbb.org<mailto:AHansen@council.bbb.org>>, Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@gmail.com<mailto:gabrielaszlak@gmail.com>> Subject: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this public comment: Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution procedure<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-picdrp-02oct13-en.htm> (PICDRP). The BC advocated for public interest commitments (beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the DRP. Need a volunteer… We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the challenge. Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and comment. Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions. We will finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct. Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead. --Steve