Dear All, Have tracked the changes suggested on the call today. If I've missed something please feel free to edit in. Will wait a couple of hours and then send to Marika. Will also follow up on Pam's commitment for annual reports on WHOIS Access recommendation #2 and circulate. And also follow up for Liz's clarification on WHOIS Studies. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited. From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:icann@rodenbaugh.com] Sent: 23 August 2011 20:24 To: 'Zahid Jamil'; 'Bc-Gnso' Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RAP Annotated Motion Thanks. I agree that we need to keep pushing on the "uniformity of contracts" issue. Staff's drafting of the relevant resolved clause to say that the WG 'did not achieve consensus' and so the Council will drop the issue is Unacceptable. The Council achieved consensus long ago that the issue should be studied (see the original resolution and the Charter). The WG did have virtually unanimous consensus, at least outside of the purely self-interested contracting parties, that there should be uniformity around contracting parties' responsibility to deal with abuse. A lot of work went into demonstrating the lack of uniformity and how it has created confusion around contracting parties' responsibility to deal with abuse. This is nothing more than contracting parties trying to bury an issue that they don't like, and Staff eating out of their hands since it would clearly be less work for Staff if the issue is dropped. We should keep fighting and I am happy to help with that. Best, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Zahid Jamil Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 7:29 AM To: 'Bc-Gnso' Subject: [bc-gnso] RAP Annotated Motion Annotated motions prepared by Berry Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.