Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues, The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by which PICS enforcement can be strengthened. Considering that the March PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is going in the right direction in my view. I support this good work. Thanks and kind regards, RA Ron Andruff RNA Partners <http://www.rnapartners.com> www.rnapartners.com From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29 To: bc-gnso@icann.org Cc: Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this public comment: Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-picdrp-02oct13-en.htm> procedure (PICDRP). The BC advocated for public interest commitments (beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the DRP. Need a volunteer. We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the challenge. Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and comment. Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions. We will finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct. Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead. --Steve