please do respond individually. I think that we can improve the meetings through candid feedback. A few of my comments: 2015 and beyond IG session was poorly planned and missing expert speakers on first segment. second segment did not fulfill meeting description. Was very good to have major number of hotel rooms and facilities for meeting in one venue. Tent was a challenging idea, and moving to rotating its use was fair resolution to a poor situation. Not enough time in public forum. Forum used to be full day. consider returning to longer PF, with effort to encourage input from newcomers, nextgen, govts, developing co speakers. Maybe organize differently to ensure some diversity in one segment. should have real bd meeting at least at annual meeting. THAT meeting might then be Friday am. once a year. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message:
From: Lynn Lipinski <lynn.lipinski@icann.org> Date: October 16, 2014 at 6:25:31 PM PDT To: Lynn Lipinski <lynn.lipinski@icann.org> Subject: Tell us what you thought of ICANN 51 in Los Angeles
Dear ICANN 51 participant:
Which sessions were most valuable to you, and which were least valuable? How would you rate the quality of the live interpretation? Take just a few minutes and send us your thoughts via the ICANN 51 Participant Survey today. All ICANN 51 participants are encouraged to provide feedback.
Let us know about your experience. Future meetings can be made better but only through your feedback. The survey will be available until Wednesday, 5 November.
Click here: https://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_6zoOPdrRhB7DcQB to take survey in:
العربية 中文 English Français Português Русский Español
You are receiving this email because you told us when you registered that it was OK to send you information about the meeting. Thank you!
— Lynn Lipinski Executive Communications Manager +1 310 745 4263 (mobile) lynn.lipinski@icann.org lynn.lipinski.icann (Skype)