Hello, On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
bravo George.
Thanks for the kind words, Mike. I almost didn't believe it when I read it, but a very candid remark was made in today's IRT comments archive by someone from NAF (one of the UDRP providers): http://forum.icann.org/lists/irtp-draft-report/msg00033.html "Complainants have pushed, and Panelists have taken the opportunity, over time, to broaden the scope of the UDRP, but it started out as a mechanism only for clear cut cases of cybersquatting." For many of us who are appalled at some of the decisions that panels make, a statement like that from the actual provider is invaluable in the event one ever wants to challenge a UDRP decision in real court. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/