I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance..... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard