I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke. Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ???? Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance..... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns. ________________________________ From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org <owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org> Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010 Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance. .... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
I agree with Jonathan domain portfolio management issues are critical to most businesses I think the BC focuses on some of the issues that impact management such as WHOIS, registrar compliance with the RAA, registrar and registry security etc. I know there are other issues I face with managing a portfolio that are not addressed in the BC. From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Matkowsky, Jonathan Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:22 PM To: marilynscade@hotmail.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be; john@crediblecontext.com Cc: bc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns. ________________________________ From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org <owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org> Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010 Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance. .... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
ICA certainly believes it is a worthy topic for BC consideration. Philip S. Corwin Partner Butera & Andrews 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20004 202-347-6875 (office) 202-347-6876 (fax) 202-255-6172 (cell) "Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey ________________________________ From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] on behalf of Susan Kawaguchi [skawaguchi@fb.com] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:30 PM To: Matkowsky, Jonathan; marilynscade@hotmail.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be; john@crediblecontext.com Cc: bc-gnso@icann.org Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are I agree with Jonathan domain portfolio management issues are critical to most businesses I think the BC focuses on some of the issues that impact management such as WHOIS, registrar compliance with the RAA, registrar and registry security etc. I know there are other issues I face with managing a portfolio that are not addressed in the BC. From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Matkowsky, Jonathan Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:22 PM To: marilynscade@hotmail.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be; john@crediblecontext.com Cc: bc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns. ________________________________ From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org <owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org> Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010 Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance. .... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
hi all, first time back on the 'net since the meetings (a great trip to Machu Picchu, but no internet access to speak of). i'd like to join this bandwagon -- my portfolio is small, but it means a lot to me and that's the reason i've been so involved with the endless ongoing series of Inter Registrar Transfer Policy Transfer (IRTP) working groups. mikey On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:
I agree with Jonathan domain portfolio management issues are critical to most businesses I think the BC focuses on some of the issues that impact management such as WHOIS, registrar compliance with the RAA, registrar and registry security etc. I know there are other issues I face with managing a portfolio that are not addressed in the BC.
From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Matkowsky, Jonathan Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:22 PM To: marilynscade@hotmail.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be; john@crediblecontext.com Cc: bc-gnso@icann.org Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns.
From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org <owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org> Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010 Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are
I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance. .... and yes, I will put in a discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to participate, consult, etc.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are From: philip.sheppard@aim.be To: john@crediblecontext.com CC: marilynscade@hotmail.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke.
Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
- - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
What is our timeline for the rewrite? Thanks, Jonathan ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org <owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> To: john@crediblecontext.com <john@crediblecontext.com> Cc: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com>; 'bc - GNSO list' <bc-gnso@icann.org> Sent: Thu Dec 09 10:27:27 2010 Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain portflio management was a joke. Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ???? Philip
Marilyn, As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket: To prevent: FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
To promote: Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate with companies. Just some raw material for consideration. Berard
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
participants (6)
-
Marilyn Cade -
Matkowsky, Jonathan -
Mike O'Connor -
Phil Corwin -
philip.sheppard＠aim.be -
Susan Kawaguchi