Re: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme
Hi Tijani ALSes should make an effort to attend so we could certainly change the final sentence to You are expected to attend these sessions. The evaluation will provide us with valuable feedback. As for a generic evaluation what would that assess? Each session is different so that the learning outcomes are also different. Perhaps the presenters could establish 3-4 learning outcomes to check whether these have been achieved after their session. This would give a true indication of whether the CB programme was in fact effective and useful. Perhaps its my teaching background coming out. J Maureen From: Tijani BEN JEMAA [mailto:tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn] Sent: Thursday, 17 April 2014 12:39 a.m. To: 'Maureen Hilyard'; 'Tijani BEN JEMAA' Cc: capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: RE: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme Thank you very much Maureen. My comments: · Its perhaps better to avoid saying that the evaluation sheet will record your attendance since people will see it as a watch dog to track them and generally, they react negatively to such things. · The evaluation sheet you are proposing is specific to each topic. I was thinking of a generic one. All the other things are ok with me. All members of the WG: please give your opinion before we finalize the sheet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- De : capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Maureen Hilyard Envoyé : mercredi 16 avril 2014 22:13 À : Tijani BEN JEMAA Cc : capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme Hi Tijani, If we want people to come to these sessions regularly, they must first learn something from them and there should not be any onerous evaluation after them. Based on the information that Dev has sent to us about the COMMUNICATION session, the evaluation draft I have prepared should firstly just tell us if we achieved OUR objectives or not, and how else we might be able to assist ALSes to better understand the topic that has been introduced for later sessions. As the initial evaluation, we also need to know that the technology is working for them too, otherwise they wont be able to attend anyway. My recommendation is to send a brief link to a monkey survey with the invitation, that participants can return after the session, consisting of the following. (To be included into the invitation?) ALSes are an important part of the At Large consultation process. Your participation in policy development sessions contributes to decision-making within At Large and ICANN overall. This session is part of a programme of topics which aims to provide some background before the ATLAS II meeting in London. You are expected to attend these sessions and the evaluation form will record your attendance as well as provide us with valuable feedback. (Evaluation form) To: (Name) Regional Group (RALO): Email address: Thank you for participating in our Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building session on COMMUNICATION Please indicate your responses to the following questions. (provide buttons to click) I was able to hear and understand the speakers during the session Yes No I had no difficulty with the technology (Adobe Connect or phone connectivity) Yes No I now understand: 1. The communication network within At Large (ALSes, RALOs, At Large Staff, the ALAC) Yes No 2. How to communicate with the At Large community (mailing list, Skype, wiki, others?) Yes No 3. Where to find information about At Large meetings (emails, At Large calendar) Yes No 4. How to connect to and participate in an At Large meeting (Adobe, phone bridge, Skype) Yes No Any comments to help us with further capacity building training in this area? (provide a comments box limit 50 words) SUBMIT (to At Large staff) _____ <http://www.avast.com/> Image removed by sender. Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! <http://www.avast.com/> est active.
Maureen, I fully agree with you, and it will be better to make them specific; my only problem is that I have to ask the trainers to establish those sheets, and at this late moments, I really hesitate to ask them. But we may ask about how the trainees feel: understand well the content? If not, what are the parts that they dont understand? This may give us almost the same result without asking the trainers for more efforts (they are volunteers as well). The other WG members: please comment ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- De : Maureen Hilyard [mailto:hilyard@oyster.net.ck] Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2014 11:55 À : tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn; 'Tijani BEN JEMAA' Cc : capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org Objet : RE: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme Hi Tijani ALSes should make an effort to attend so we could certainly change the final sentence to You are expected to attend these sessions. The evaluation will provide us with valuable feedback. As for a generic evaluation what would that assess? Each session is different so that the learning outcomes are also different. Perhaps the presenters could establish 3-4 learning outcomes to check whether these have been achieved after their session. This would give a true indication of whether the CB programme was in fact effective and useful. Perhaps its my teaching background coming out. J Maureen From: Tijani BEN JEMAA [mailto:tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn] Sent: Thursday, 17 April 2014 12:39 a.m. To: 'Maureen Hilyard'; 'Tijani BEN JEMAA' Cc: capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: RE: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme Thank you very much Maureen. My comments: · Its perhaps better to avoid saying that the evaluation sheet will record your attendance since people will see it as a watch dog to track them and generally, they react negatively to such things. · The evaluation sheet you are proposing is specific to each topic. I was thinking of a generic one. All the other things are ok with me. All members of the WG: please give your opinion before we finalize the sheet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- De : capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Maureen Hilyard Envoyé : mercredi 16 avril 2014 22:13 À : Tijani BEN JEMAA Cc : capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme Hi Tijani, If we want people to come to these sessions regularly, they must first learn something from them and there should not be any onerous evaluation after them. Based on the information that Dev has sent to us about the COMMUNICATION session, the evaluation draft I have prepared should firstly just tell us if we achieved OUR objectives or not, and how else we might be able to assist ALSes to better understand the topic that has been introduced for later sessions. As the initial evaluation, we also need to know that the technology is working for them too, otherwise they wont be able to attend anyway. My recommendation is to send a brief link to a monkey survey with the invitation, that participants can return after the session, consisting of the following. (To be included into the invitation?) ALSes are an important part of the At Large consultation process. Your participation in policy development sessions contributes to decision-making within At Large and ICANN overall. This session is part of a programme of topics which aims to provide some background before the ATLAS II meeting in London. You are expected to attend these sessions and the evaluation form will record your attendance as well as provide us with valuable feedback. (Evaluation form) To: (Name) Regional Group (RALO): Email address: Thank you for participating in our Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building session on COMMUNICATION Please indicate your responses to the following questions. (provide buttons to click) I was able to hear and understand the speakers during the session Yes No I had no difficulty with the technology (Adobe Connect or phone connectivity) Yes No I now understand: 1. The communication network within At Large (ALSes, RALOs, At Large Staff, the ALAC) Yes No 2. How to communicate with the At Large community (mailing list, Skype, wiki, others?) Yes No 3. Where to find information about At Large meetings (emails, At Large calendar) Yes No 4. How to connect to and participate in an At Large meeting (Adobe, phone bridge, Skype) Yes No Any comments to help us with further capacity building training in this area? (provide a comments box limit 50 words) SUBMIT (to At Large staff) _____ <http://www.avast.com/> Image removed by sender. Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! <http://www.avast.com/> est active. --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com
participants (2)
-
Maureen Hilyard -
Tijani BEN JEMAA