EXCELLENT work Niels, The diagram does make it a lot easier to understand the link between the "Human Right" and the corresponding ICANN policy/process. I will take a more detail look and provide further comments if possible. regards Karel On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:39 AM, <vidushi@cis-india.org> wrote:
Hi Niels,
Apologies for this delayed response.
The visualization looks great! I like the level of detail that it allows us to get into. :) A few thoughts:
1. Instead of saying "Human rights in Internet Governance discussions" perhaps we could say "Human rights in the ICANN ecosystem" or something similar? (not sure if ecosystem if the word we're looking for). This could be more specific. 2. I like the idea of the Dendogram based on frameworks - however, do you think it might be better to have a separate visualization for that? Perhaps Aarti and Tatiana can give us an idea of how much detail would be idea for the frameworks.
Cheers,
Vidushi
----- On May 22, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Seth Johnson seth.p.johnson@gmail.com wrote:
(Editing egregious grammar)
It's important to incorporate recognition of how international rights work as compared to how we're accustomed to rights working.
You can see this in relation to how the EU CoJ overruled the Safe Harbor Agreement, which was not based on rights enacted by treaty. The treaty-based Strasbourg Court, on the other hand, could have ruled the ECHR privacy right had been violated, but the treaty would have remained in place, and would have been simply modified/qualified with exceptions by the same governments whose executive branch actors wrote it in the first place.
Seth
Seth
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Motoko Aizawa <motoko.aizawa@ihrb.org>
wrote:
Dear Niels: This is amazing work. I really like the way it turned out. My only question is whether the human rights indicated are all the relevant rights in the context of ICANN. They feel right to me but we don't know for sure unless we carry out a thorough review of all the ICANN policies, it seems to me. Motoko
Motoko Aizawa | Managing Director USA M +1 202 763 1503 |S MotokoSkype11 I W www.ihrb.org I T @IHRB Bogotá | Brussels | Geneva | London | Nairobi | Washington D.C. | Yangon
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Zalnieriute, Monika <Monika.Zalnieriute@eui.eu> wrote:
Hi Niels,
Great work! I agree with Niels - dendogram would be great!
Some comments from me:
1. 'Human Rights in Internet Governance' might be too broad, as
ICANN and
its policies are just part of the 'Internet Governance Discussions', so we might want to narrow it down somewhat to make it explicit this is only ICANN-related. As there are many other areas in IG that affect HR, but we dont list them here.
Some purely on visuals:
2. In my view, the glossary and all the columns at the top would look better at the bottom of the page. Similarly, the words 'THEME', etc, in my view, look better at the top.
3. (purely personal taste): orange boxes with white text look somewhat not in consistency with the overall elegance of the style, perhaps because of black shadowing or something - I am not sure, but it gives me somewhat different look than the rest. And that rest looks very good:)
Best wishes,
Monika
----
Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I zephiroplatform.org I Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I cihr.eu I
________________________________________ From: cc-humanrights-research-bounces@icann.org <cc-humanrights-research-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 10:07 AM To: Human Rights; cc-humanrights-research@icann.org Cc: Giulia De Amicis Subject: [cc-humanrights-research] ICANN visualization 2nd draft
Dear colleagues,
Attached a second draft visualization made by the designer, as always, looking forward to your comments!
What text is missing? What more would you like to be in here?
I was thinking (maybe too much, maybe not), we could maybe also do a dendogram based on rights. With the UDHR at the bottom, the ICCPR and the ICESCR coming from that and then all the smaller treaties following that, and finally of course the Ruggie Principles and the Global compact. This might build on the work done by Tatiana and Aarti on relevant frameworks? It defintely needs some research and lawyer touch :)
Curious to hear what you all think!
Best,
Niels
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
cc-humanrights-research mailing list cc-humanrights-research@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights-research