-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Olivier, Thank you for this questions. It was indeed intended as indicated by Rafik. Best, Niels Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 On 03/24/2015 03:25 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Olivier,
I cannot speak for the authors and their intention here. that is just guessing : this WP can make a statement as group but not representing SOs/ACs positions i.e. no ratification needed. it is better that the authors Niels and Marilia clarify this part.
Best,
Rafik
2015-03-24 2:11 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>:
Dear Rafik,
in the text you have quoted:
On 23/03/2015 12:57, Rafik Dammak wrote:
(v) To propose procedures and mechanisms with the aim of producing assessments on if and how policies and procedures under developed and/or being implemented may impact on human rights.
developed -> development and...
(vi) Draft Position Papers and Statements as deemed appropriate
"Statements" is a loaded word which implies ratification by SOs & ACs. Is this the intent? Kind regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVGzVFAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjppXgH/j2hbKjDtuR6q67SeBrqEkHq 4EoxjrNXvvvYXYz9XnNH4DaXeyf772yMLZKYokez/s/ZcIh8P10LPZgp2+f6XnbX MrKzT3Csa2EeNYro1r6OVa49BpmhSthyk6XDO9A040wp3YtGzHmMX/bwwvDaLCGr MLTu9DW+pMojmqpjBPFy1OFIg+c6Kd+Lb4TKryRakeopZlMEV2NETw5QQ82uuWb+ HyAbwUWBA//aAyt+RS/BfFWqwe6Qs0LyZwPOZs1sN93M/jmioxjGLnw6xEPNSUkA B35Z3uc0vpan3oCs797zEdgQkR0iVKYmNcOC8d77C5KZpzPbNosd5R/kzXUZrns= =ScUa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----