Hi Marilia, the presentation is attached, quick skimming the of the schedule skeleton I see Wednesday is the only day when it is possible to organize a session but it will be clashing with PDP WGs meetings. there is also the cross-community collaboration session but it depends how SOs/ACs will plan them. Best, Rafik 2016-03-04 9:18 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com>:
Hi Niels,
This is an excellent idea and we would be happy to be involved. CCing my colleague Luca Belli, from the IGF Dynamic Coalition on platform responsibility. It seems that there are lots of studies and initiatives moving on the same direction. David Kaye is offering good opportunities for people to know each other's work, in addition to contributing to his upcoming report.
There was a good presentation about what is being envisioned as a structure for meeting B in the NCPH meeting in LA. You can find out more in the transcripts. The GNSO will be discussing this topic in its Saturday session. Maybe we can have more insights on where to fit it then.
Best! M
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
yes , that is what I wanted to highlight. meeting B will be challenging for community in term of scheduling my understanding is meeting planning will start just after marrakech.
Best,
Rafik
2016-03-01 4:59 GMT+09:00 Patrik Fältström <paf@netnod.se>:
Note specifically that the "meeting format B" have very specific items that are allowed, and not, the various days. I.e. it is explicit that certain things should not be worked on at a "meeting of type B".
Patrik
On 29 Feb 2016, at 20:35, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
ICANN56 is going to be format "B" which means an icann meeting of 4 days only and schedule totalky different from what we used to . Not sure about scheduling constraints but it will be more than usual. I will check the specifics
Best,
Rafik On Mar 1, 2016 1:58 AM, "Niels ten Oever" <niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi all,
During last Fridays call there was a lot of interest in organizing a Intermediary Liability sessions at the next ICANN meeting (ICANN56), together with the ISPs, Registries and Registrars.
It would probably make sense to: 1) Advertise the mini session on Intermediary Liability during the CCWP HR session. 2) Reach out to the ISPs, Registries and Registrars in person during ICANN54 3) Once everyone is on the same page organize it, set agenda, invite speakers, arrange space and agenda slot.
This thread serves to bring people together to organize this.
I am more than willing to help doing this.
All the best,
Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
Patrik Fältström Head of Research and Development Netnod
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en