Dear Mallory, Thank you so much. I have incorporated the changes as needed. I really appreciate. Best Regards, Ephraim Percy Kenyanito On 08/07/2022 20:00, Mallory Knodel wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Ephraim. I've made some comments. Mostly I think it's good and for wider reach perhaps just needs a bit more careful introductory language for folks not that familiar with ICANN or its WHOIS-tangential processes over the last 4+ years.
Thanks!
-Mallory
On 6/15/22 12:50 PM, Ephraim Percy Kenyanito via cc-humanrights wrote:
Dear CCWP-HR,
Please find the prose document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XwC5YBDViRDME4Et7wzMchCkHe6z82V83Gpcb2dJ...
Please feel free to add any comments.
--
Best Regards,
Ephraim Percy Kenyanito
Public Policy Specialist/ Regulatory Affairs Specialist/ Project Manager- International Trade, Technology, Media & Telecommunications Laws Website: https://ekenyanito.com/ Twitter: @ekenyanito <https://twitter.com/ekenyanito> PGP Fingerprint: B0FA394AF73DEB7AA1FDC7360CFED26DE6BA8DC1 On 29/05/2022 15:23, Ephraim Percy Kenyanito wrote:
Dear team,
Hope you are all well.
This is in reference to previous conversations on the topic.
Franc (copied here in this email) has been helpful in looking through the documents.
Please find attached the analysis here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R0j8RwbUrxbPxVIe_5Hgc4CRNUaXkSoyZ-xX...
The document contains two sheets;
First, EPDP HRIA- analyses the EPDP Phase 2 Recommendations which inform the ODA Report.
Second, ODA HRIA- analyses the ODA Recommendations which aims to implement the EPDP Report.
FYI- The ODA Report is informed by the EPDP Report though in some instances ICANN might have misunderstood the EPDP Report and ICANN Board wrote to the GNSO Council raising this questions:
1.
Whether the ODA has correctly interpreted the intent of the SSAD recommendations in the proposed implementation;
2.
Whether the ODA has overlooked any key aspects of the SSAD recommendations that should be factored in by the ICANN Board when it considers the recommendations;
3.
Its view on the concerns identified by the ICANN Board and potential options that could be considered, either in the form of changes to the proposed implementation or the policy recommendations themselves, to address these concerns (note, these are expected to be high level suggestions at this stage);
4.
Any other aspects that help inform the Council’s deliberations and consultation with the ICANN Board.
For background here are the original documents that were being analysed:
1.
EPDP Phase 2 Final Report: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phase...
2.
ODA Final Report: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf
I look forward to your feedback as I begin working on the prose report which I hope to complete the first version by June 7^th and will be scheduled to be maximum 10 pages for transmission to the board via NCSG (which CCWP-HR is seated).
Please feel free to let me know in case of any questions.
---
Best Regards,
*EPK*
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Mallory Knodel CTO, Center for Democracy and Technology gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780