Yes, ofcourse! Thanks to Rafik for comments on the doc, look forward to more input as well. Cheers. On 20/01/17 19:06, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Of course comments on this are still very welcome, right Vidushi?
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
On 01/19/2017 03:18 PM, vidushi@cis-india.org wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
It's been a while! Hope everyone is having a great start to the year.
Following our discussion in Hyderabad, I began working on a report that studies the economic, social and cultural rights impact of ICANN's policies and procedures. There is very little literature on this at the moment and so I think it will be a useful addition to our work. Ahead of our call tomorrow, I'm sharing the first draft of this report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bexABsbetOsP2nPubhxqE3cas6UbuXJiapAendA...
Look forward to discussing this with you all. In addition to comments and suggestions on the paper in general, I'd be interested to hear feedback on the following: 1. The choice to confine the report to one instrument for economic, social and cultural rights, as opposed to a broader analysis. 2. Possible policies and procedures we could look into further.
Sincerely,
Vidushi _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights