Human Rights and ICANN - session description
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome. _________ Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities. To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner. ________ What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers? Thanks in advance, Niels - -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgJg6AAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpfgIH/Ahw7EnbLadprEhpbolxjbfp H1Hq+Q9jZ1P49vl7YOazDgrhrLOLH7f13CSS0yB6vD0rvpGneSYjnvUYBTpgr6Dk Sv4JXTmMCkRlYinkPxNkpTRN2HhpkuVJt5jF2no+EnZuSicmRaLR4/F5yvB6b7NU Lnlau5iAJ8EwvI/SYGnOAmy8i2Mz9Xwb8MOBb9EuMD4FfeK8ZeRW9R710jTiRxzI mc54edWBPv0Z46gBusjFxcs9RayE/n8nx5uO5AsADxsiQQiZf1DnkgnLpNwcOI0g gtHB50F9C/+e6wJg+j3+2j5cEeOYViGyDebjaW6BpkL4IsCcMDutzUGCs08GK8U= =GDyW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi Niels, I am not senior within ICANN but I guess I can help for this. Rafik Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
- --
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgJg6AAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpfgIH/Ahw7EnbLadprEhpbolxjbfp H1Hq+Q9jZ1P49vl7YOazDgrhrLOLH7f13CSS0yB6vD0rvpGneSYjnvUYBTpgr6Dk Sv4JXTmMCkRlYinkPxNkpTRN2HhpkuVJt5jF2no+EnZuSicmRaLR4/F5yvB6b7NU Lnlau5iAJ8EwvI/SYGnOAmy8i2Mz9Xwb8MOBb9EuMD4FfeK8ZeRW9R710jTiRxzI mc54edWBPv0Z46gBusjFxcs9RayE/n8nx5uO5AsADxsiQQiZf1DnkgnLpNwcOI0g gtHB50F9C/+e6wJg+j3+2j5cEeOYViGyDebjaW6BpkL4IsCcMDutzUGCs08GK8U= =GDyW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it). What do you people think? Best, Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUga5fAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpVdsIAIAEgJdwlFk+ee6DW1fjMlIZ AI2Qr7VgvaMyyzUep4w5taGYT+rGoijbEmLrBTZ55KVuHfi96zqa4r5ETfmAkgx0 aSvp6OZUhA/BTP9OnOpnAlB1MCU7MC4hGZ+YMHAtGbvroknx5BHTsW1l7YbXDdyv O3qBAsmm34jQjaPNyNLOeLKoO+r9srU16/mIgJDM5LaYcM6jUnT2LaQQSXI2xEz1 lu5UhjXyOooft62RVx0ChRzMXOppDdJs/w+qAkdna4U+3SCx6ADn9iHkoz9K9awC Wh+DZCIhenB1CYFo6qp19VJk9QNmYQ4a4sLEVK/cLvdeq5sRXzTekb5r41Dac/k= =LCHC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi Niels, Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time. Rafik 2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUga5fAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpVdsIAIAEgJdwlFk+ee6DW1fjMlIZ AI2Qr7VgvaMyyzUep4w5taGYT+rGoijbEmLrBTZ55KVuHfi96zqa4r5ETfmAkgx0 aSvp6OZUhA/BTP9OnOpnAlB1MCU7MC4hGZ+YMHAtGbvroknx5BHTsW1l7YbXDdyv O3qBAsmm34jQjaPNyNLOeLKoO+r9srU16/mIgJDM5LaYcM6jUnT2LaQQSXI2xEz1 lu5UhjXyOooft62RVx0ChRzMXOppDdJs/w+qAkdna4U+3SCx6ADn9iHkoz9K9awC Wh+DZCIhenB1CYFo6qp19VJk9QNmYQ4a4sLEVK/cLvdeq5sRXzTekb5r41Dac/k= =LCHC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rafik, You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ? I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that. Best, Niels Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgbOqAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpzmoIAKZVDa/bDLQY1fS3f2wyA3pp MYa8H5tXg58uBqYEm7ncUEaUQOws5Qy0Lq3tYuOLhXahY32hyeQxheQF/DC7XsFr EHew4jNaKU6WiTsJNZaid59IKD3l7HbLB2v8UwUzElsA/Wr+KFo2lLX7fsoyATQ7 Oja3au1UOeiFYxdpuGGf4TaE86VnN9GRMVWx1fQ7cdrvCx7bUPwKmlcgSerWyEJj JXofi3jyiN/7rCxwJKK2FpZWkRYtV+3378Shi9q8dnSsKz15cuJ+KSNGg7q7ARZG 1rjLyOqK/8dvnRQbSZLrrYjmBePudArcBnoUYK8jjkSogCISsFZgz8vr8gL1rPc= =xyZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important. I’d ask for Wednesday morning. BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgbOqAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpzmoIAKZVDa/bDLQY1fS3f2wyA3pp MYa8H5tXg58uBqYEm7ncUEaUQOws5Qy0Lq3tYuOLhXahY32hyeQxheQF/DC7XsFr EHew4jNaKU6WiTsJNZaid59IKD3l7HbLB2v8UwUzElsA/Wr+KFo2lLX7fsoyATQ7 Oja3au1UOeiFYxdpuGGf4TaE86VnN9GRMVWx1fQ7cdrvCx7bUPwKmlcgSerWyEJj JXofi3jyiN/7rCxwJKK2FpZWkRYtV+3378Shi9q8dnSsKz15cuJ+KSNGg7q7ARZG 1rjLyOqK/8dvnRQbSZLrrYjmBePudArcBnoUYK8jjkSogCISsFZgz8vr8gL1rPc= =xyZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
Thanks Rafik for assisting with the room. The description looks good. A three hour session can be dynamic, it depends on how we divide the time and plan it. We certainly have a lot of angles to cover. I agree with Bill that Monday morning seems the best option. Best wishes, Marília On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:41 AM, William Drake <wjdrake@gmail.com> wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgbOqAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpzmoIAKZVDa/bDLQY1fS3f2wyA3pp MYa8H5tXg58uBqYEm7ncUEaUQOws5Qy0Lq3tYuOLhXahY32hyeQxheQF/DC7XsFr EHew4jNaKU6WiTsJNZaid59IKD3l7HbLB2v8UwUzElsA/Wr+KFo2lLX7fsoyATQ7 Oja3au1UOeiFYxdpuGGf4TaE86VnN9GRMVWx1fQ7cdrvCx7bUPwKmlcgSerWyEJj JXofi3jyiN/7rCxwJKK2FpZWkRYtV+3378Shi9q8dnSsKz15cuJ+KSNGg7q7ARZG 1rjLyOqK/8dvnRQbSZLrrYjmBePudArcBnoUYK8jjkSogCISsFZgz8vr8gL1rPc= =xyZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marilia, you mean Wednesday morning, right (since Monday is blocked)? So let's opt from 9:30 up to 12:30 then. Cheers, Niels Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 On 12/05/2014 02:57 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
Thanks Rafik for assisting with the room. The description looks good. A three hour session can be dynamic, it depends on how we divide the time and plan it. We certainly have a lot of angles to cover. I agree with Bill that Monday morning seems the best option. Best wishes, Marília
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:41 AM, William Drake <wjdrake@gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com>> wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org> william.drake@uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com> (lists), www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org> ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgbrJAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjp+UUH/iyGHHuYoZiyyUD7F7Nd9bQi u8h3FHyGsH7cPHRWh6sVd2jcUInQRaVNaYSzjNE2QELynBI0ZYm/C8W6NknwnhXU FQcdr7ZHmowACYD0Ts7IJXSuhksTEmj9SKrUaY4sj4QSACefwPEL9C1rRO1+cpSN DYZ46qE5N2Fh4rgzXHsTvTz6uVNBRJMnaIh9O0pdKDIoAdTUMWm9HHyctO9QkhrD t/BHanqRUJ+wQjaWqzC8URYTbH8/OWYCohe5xsGGtG2Jb9G4JvIjekxmYk1RZNTF bhOaqQI9y4Pc4X5nPbf6CjFcL8ygbrzfHwxeUEaG1uZSKwSN0dK774keUd7Xk0Q= =C5lH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello all, it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh> Olivier On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
Hi , I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot. 3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that). Rafik 2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked.. Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours. Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate. Best, Marília On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights > mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org > <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <cc-humanrights@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
Hi, I meant checking quickly if there are other sessions (e.g. checking schedules in previous ICANN meetings or if someone is aware about new session) to mitigate risks of clashes, after submission we cannot request changes. Rafik 2014-12-05 23:39 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com>:
Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..
Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours.
Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate.
Best,
Marília
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi ,
I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote: > Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
> I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
> but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
> Rafik
> Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org > <mailto:niels@article19.org> <niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
> Hi all,
> It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at > ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All > comments are very welcome.
> _________
> Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
> There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that > some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications > for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to > privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such > rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to > assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally > agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible > methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
> To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case > basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for > starting a process that could address them in a more systemic > manner.
> ________
> What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy > to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN > meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the > ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
> Thanks in advance,
> Niels
>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights >> mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org >> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <cc-humanrights@icann.org> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, For your reference, the ICANN51 schedule: http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule-full Monday afternoon is risky because it might overlap with ICANN accountability discussions, updates on new gTLDs, etc. Wednesday morning is risky because of the CCWG on Internet Governance. But since the latter is from 8:30 - 9:45, if we start at 9:30, we should be OK with a slow start. Will you keep the same time for Singapore for this workshop Bill ? If so, I'd go for Wednesday morning. Best, Niels Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 On 12/05/2014 04:06 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi,
I meant checking quickly if there are other sessions (e.g. checking schedules in previous ICANN meetings or if someone is aware about new session) to mitigate risks of clashes, after submission we cannot request changes.
Rafik
2014-12-05 23:39 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com <mailto:mariliamaciel@gmail.com>>:
Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..
Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours.
Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate.
Best,
Marília
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi ,
I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever<niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
> _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> > <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN,www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org> william.drake@uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com> (lists), www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org> ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgcvkAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpD0AH/2+cZgNl6h+jJxFor39Pk2gF qbMAzoU71Kkifnh2RNPt1nCK4k/PY65VUNpKrN4mu8vT8ucOBvWnRWI16bXfZPAc UIUFf98TI5Hu8peeLvxjvJuzhkdKga5eOABzAkfbnAYiBsCeBuE93vZyZR/AtdUQ 3wSDos6H0nz0HzYM0YmR/Rt7OgR0ersfXMU4LPh3nxigbI/5KLG3T/S4VhOcRfHd 49cSTFMMgez01t42Y8SCn5soq/r4pdusBM4Z+FqUky/lDmo79hmB6p+EiWCY8uMz wtLEHuDL+j9ziXryzB/v3Zu7dG5KJX7P9NwfBdaijR8CcKtfKQHNrdYQBJe8cI4= =tDJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
A reminder that the draft proposal is posted here: http://www.stu.edu/law/AlexHannaLibrary/HRACProposalDraft/tabid/5785/Default... Roy Balleste Director, Summer in Spain Program Law Library Director & Professor of Law St. Thomas University Law Library 16401 NW 37th Avenue Miami Gardens, FL 33054 305-623-2341 http://royballeste.org/ From: cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 9:58 AM To: Marilia Maciel Cc: Human Rights Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] Human Rights and ICANN - session description Hi, I meant checking quickly if there are other sessions (e.g. checking schedules in previous ICANN meetings or if someone is aware about new session) to mitigate risks of clashes, after submission we cannot request changes. Rafik 2014-12-05 23:39 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com<mailto:mariliamaciel@gmail.com>>: Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked.. Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours. Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate. Best, Marília On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi , I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot. 3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that). Rafik 2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com<mailto:ocl@gih.com>>: Hello all, it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh> Olivier On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org><mailto:niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ? I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that. Best, Niels Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org<mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org><mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org<mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org><mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org<mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org><mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org<mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org<http://www.ncuc.org> william.drake@uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com<mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com> (lists), www.williamdrake.org<http://www.williamdrake.org> ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org<mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org<mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org<mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights -- Marília Maciel Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu<http://www.diplomacy.edu> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roy, I though this was living draft document on an Etherpad that could give input on discussion around the CCWG, not a statement (yet?). It might be good if the text would reflect that, now it seems that people have signed on to this. Best, Niels On 12/09/2014 09:53 PM, Balleste, Roy wrote:
A reminder that the draft proposal is posted here:
http://www.stu.edu/law/AlexHannaLibrary/HRACProposalDraft/tabid/5785/Default...
Roy Balleste
Director, Summer in Spain Program
Law Library Director &
Professor of Law
St. Thomas University Law Library
16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami Gardens, FL 33054
305-623-2341
*From:*cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 9:58 AM *To:* Marilia Maciel *Cc:* Human Rights *Subject:* Re: [cc-humanrights] Human Rights and ICANN - session description
Hi,
I meant checking quickly if there are other sessions (e.g. checking schedules in previous ICANN meetings or if someone is aware about new session) to mitigate risks of clashes, after submission we cannot request changes.
Rafik
2014-12-05 23:39 GMT+09:00 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com <mailto:mariliamaciel@gmail.com>>:
Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..
Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours.
Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate.
Best,
Marília
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi ,
I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> wrote:
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
*********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org> william.drake@uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com> (lists), www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org> ***********************************************
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
--
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu>
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUh5bWAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpDpoH/1iteqVX7CqdR6FUEQOHCIZ6 g95uhWHdbpc44glCealVqveIkzfn2rlAeSNNXhuheQu1WRIYmj0/IEuoDvWRAfYb f0xESeVEi8IRIPHIEvXoutfRipQxrb3rXvjjHQ6yo3xsLs7HfymY3cyhU2/ojOl2 zkegR3ZWzkcM0jJ6imgGzq2ejGZ1FNj9WEP3mbb2VaJnxj2MdRm5PRSIkdc/2qtS HWn8T7DaaR2HPWZpoLaRD8IZznnOOuQnRVAKC/qFtTQaY0kEu/mb+cFBVu0CMigK kaoKuw7lPvMShJt26WXh6e0CrVI5mW9E+/tY4UkpdbypEF9DkkUWLzuNGBcuDSM= =4wkd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I am reluctant to turn Monday into pure circus. Nothing wrong with Monday afternoon. We will have substance.... cheers Steph On 2014-12-05, 9:39, Marilia Maciel wrote:
Yes, I meant Wednesday. Thanks for the correction Niels. Although Olivier mentioned that Monday afternoon is not blocked..
Considering the meeting will always clash with something else, a 3-hour session could be strategic to allow people to join us at some moment. We could even explicitly divide the session in "part 1" and "part 2", so people that could come (although late) do not feel they missed too much and still feel encouraged to attend. Of course, this is besides the fact that we do have a lot of substantive topics to discuss. I understand Rafik´s point, but maybe we should try to push for the three hours.
Rafik, do you suggest we wait to book the room, so we coordinate with other sessions being scheduled? Isn´t it dangerous in terms of securing a room for us? I think it is better to have it scheduled as soon as possible. If something substantial changes on the agenda we re-evaluate.
Best,
Marília
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi ,
I think we should see the different SO/AC sessions ( we have also the CCWG on IG session too!) and find some possible time slot.
3 hours is long and not necessarily easy to secure room (while we could do that in London for a different topic , not sure we can reiterate that).
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:59 GMT+09:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote: > you can't program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important. > > I'd ask for Wednesday morning. > > BD > >> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> wrote: >>
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote: >>> Hi Niels, >>> >>> Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had >>> such conflict last time. >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> >>> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>>: >>> >>> >>> On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote: >>>> Hi Niels, >>> >>> >>> Hi Rafik, >>> >>>> I am not senior within ICANN >>> >>> Well, at least more senior than me ;) >>> >>>> but I guess I can help for this. >>> >>> That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday >>> afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. >>> Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we >>> could easily fill it). >>> >>> What do you people think? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Niels >>> >>>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> >>>> Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> >>>> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>> >>>> It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at >>>> ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All >>>> comments are very welcome. >>> >>>> _________ >>> >>>> Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation >>> >>>> There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that >>>> some of ICANN's policies and other actions may have implications >>>> for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to >>>> privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such >>>> rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to >>>> assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally >>>> agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible >>>> methods for addressing any incompatibilities. >>> >>>> To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case >>>> basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for >>>> starting a process that could address them in a more systemic >>>> manner. >>> >>>> ________ >>> >>>> What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy >>>> to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN >>>> meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the >>>> ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers? >>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>>> Niels >>> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights >>>>> mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> >>>>> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> >>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights >>> >>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________ >> cc-humanrights mailing list >> cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > > *********************************************** > William J. Drake > International Fellow & Lecturer > Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ > University of Zurich, Switzerland > Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, > ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org> > william.drake@uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com> (lists), > www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org> > *********************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > cc-humanrights mailing list > cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights >
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu <http://www.diplomacy.edu> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
Hi Thanks for the precision Olivier, not absolutely blocked but strongly discouraged, especially for new ‘discretionary’ initiatives as opposed to must-happen-somewhere SO AC meetings. At least that’s my experience in pitching a couple NCUC workshops over the past years, we were told we needed to do Wednesday. But maybe if there’s believed to be sufficient oomph behind this one the response would differ. (Of course I agree about Fridays, but it seems from when you and I tried to raise that in the SOACSGC chairs’ context it is not a conversation that can be had.) Anyway, there’s really no good solution. Monday will inevitably get loaded with the big ticket stuff, IANA accountability new gTLD etc. Wednesday morning presumably would be CCWG IG (have you and Rafik been in discussion with staff to ensure?) and other. Thursday morning ALAC etc. So alas the question is, as conflict is inevitable and there will be parts of the community that simply can’t come, which conflict would at least make it possible for the core group here to attend, and then anyone else we can get is gravy. There might be one other option: they’re moving GAC-Board to Tuesday morning, which might mean open space late afternoon. I’ve written to David Olive to inquire. BD
On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Hello all,
it is possible to program for Monday afternoon. They frown upon it because that takes people out of the main room but the ALAC and other WGs have staged meetings on Monday afternoon with little interference. One of the problems is that by killing Fridays the week has become shorter and with the Thursday circus Thursday is now dead. With Monday risking being filled by the circus too we have Tuesday which is impossible due to Constituency day. But guess what, I'm now told some parts of Constituency day might happen on Wednesday morning too. So Wednesday afternoon? Oh now, that's GNSO wrap up. <sigh>
Olivier
On 05/12/2014 14:41, William Drake wrote:
you can’t program on Monday, they block it out for official stuff they think is more important.
>
> I’d ask for Wednesday morning.
>
> BD
>
>> On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> wrote:
>>
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org/>
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN
Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this.
That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org> <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit :
Hi all,
It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome.
_________
Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation
There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities.
To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner.
________
What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers?
Thanks in advance,
Niels
> _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights > mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:listcc-humanrights@icann.org> > <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights>
___
agree with Monday, agree with three hours. STephanie On 2014-12-05, 8:29, Niels ten Oever wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Rafik,
You're right. Tuesday is constituency day, so that is ruled out. Can we do Monday afternoon 13:30 - 16:30 ?
I also found in the archives we agreed earlier on a three hour meeting, so let's go for that.
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 12/05/2014 02:17 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi Niels,
Wednesday afternoon has the GNSO council public meeting and we had such conflict last time.
Rafik
2014-12-05 22:07 GMT+09:00 Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>>:
On 12/04/2014 06:24 PM, Rafik wrote:
Hi Niels,
Hi Rafik,
I am not senior within ICANN Well, at least more senior than me ;)
but I guess I can help for this. That's excellent. I think we agreed on a session on Wednesday afternoon, as per Bills proposal. I think two hours would suffice. Three hours seems a but like a an overkill (even though I know we could easily fill it).
What do you people think?
Best,
Niels
Rafik
Le 5 Dec 2014 à 02:20, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> a écrit : Hi all, It seems there is consensus about the text for the session at ICANN52, or does anyone have any issues with this text? All comments are very welcome. _________ Human right and ICANN - continuing the conversation There is a growing recognition in parts of the community that some of ICANN’s policies and other actions may have implications for human rights like freedom of expression and the right to privacy. While ICANN is not the place to negotiate over such rights, it would be advisable on political and other grounds to assess whether our work is fully consistent with internationally agreed human rights laws and policies, and to identify possible methods for addressing any incompatibilities. To date, these issues have been discussed on a case by case basis. This cross-community workshop will consider options for starting a process that could address them in a more systemic manner. ________ What would be the process to request the room? I would be happy to send some emails, but given the experiences during last ICANN meeting it might be more effective if someone more senior in the ICANN hierarchy would send it. Any takers? Thanks in advance, Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing listcc-humanrights@icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgbOqAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpzmoIAKZVDa/bDLQY1fS3f2wyA3pp MYa8H5tXg58uBqYEm7ncUEaUQOws5Qy0Lq3tYuOLhXahY32hyeQxheQF/DC7XsFr EHew4jNaKU6WiTsJNZaid59IKD3l7HbLB2v8UwUzElsA/Wr+KFo2lLX7fsoyATQ7 Oja3au1UOeiFYxdpuGGf4TaE86VnN9GRMVWx1fQ7cdrvCx7bUPwKmlcgSerWyEJj JXofi3jyiN/7rCxwJKK2FpZWkRYtV+3378Shi9q8dnSsKz15cuJ+KSNGg7q7ARZG 1rjLyOqK/8dvnRQbSZLrrYjmBePudArcBnoUYK8jjkSogCISsFZgz8vr8gL1rPc= =xyZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
participants (8)
-
Balleste, Roy -
Marilia Maciel -
Niels ten Oever -
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond -
Rafik -
Rafik Dammak
-
Stephanie Perrin -
William Drake