Hi Katrina, Thanks for this message. I think that a call would be really good to start the process. I am available at the suggested date and time. Best, Giovanni [cid:image002.jpg@01D6045C.FD7DC9F0]<http://www.eurid.eu/>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager EURid vzw Telecomlaan 9, 1831 Diegem, Belgium T: +32 2 401 27 50 | M: +39 335 8141733 www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> RPR Brussel – VAT BE 0864.240.405 [cid:image003.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830]<https://twitter.com/EUregistry> [cid:image004.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/eurid/> [cid:image005.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Sent: 27 March 2020 17:22 To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org>; 'Barbara Povše Golob' <barbara.povse@register.si>; 'Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC' <sdeerhake@nic.as>; 'Eberhard W Lisse' <el@lisse.na>; Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu>; 'Régis MASSE' <regis.masse@afnic.fr>; 'Jacques Latour' <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>; 'Pierre Bonis' <pierre.bonis@afnic.fr>; sophie.canac@afnic.fr Cc: ccnsosecretariat@icann.org Subject: ICANN68 Dear Councillors, Working group and Committee Chairs, I hope and wish that everyone is healthy and safe and that all your registries are fully operational! With situation around COVID-19 escalating quickly and many countries being at lockdown, it is highly likely that ICANN68 will be a remote-only meeting too. How should we proceed? If we wish to maintain the ccNSO as the global platform for ccTLDs, we need to begin preparations as early as possible. Meeting Programme Committee already had a call this week; they looked back at the lessons from ICANN67 and started thinking about ICANN68. The ccNSO Council also has started thinking about possible ways to ensure that the ccNSO remains effective during this difficult time. As we did for ICANN67, we will schedule a call to discuss, inter alia: * What have we learned from the virtual ICANN67? * What meetings definitely need to be held within the time-boundaries of ICANN68 – and what are criteria for determining this, * What meetings should be held, but not necessarily within the time-boundaries of iCANN68? (For example, as webinars) * Which meetings can / should be deferred until the next face-to-face meeting, * Additional sessions/meetings to be held (update webinars, informational calls, etc.), * Contribution(s) to Plenary sessions etc. Would Tuesday, April 7, 12 UTC work for you? After this initial conversation and further clarification from ICANN Org, we will also need to discuss challenges such as time zones and community engagement and if there are any additional requirements with respect to format of those sessions we will be having virtually. Have a nice weekend, stay healthy and safe! Kind regards, ]{atrina Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy
