Dear Alejandra and all, I follow Barrack's views and think we need to understand better what were ALAC's initial questionmarks, further intentions and objectives. Based on that, it will be easier to elaborate on their interest (one-shot or deeper?) and choose to have a regular relationship with ALAC within the spirit of the multistakeholder model; This approach would serve outreach and other communication objective ccNSO may have with the Icann community as a whole. Kind regards, Marie-Noémie -----Message d'origine----- De : Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] De la part de barrack--- via Ccnso-council Envoyé : jeudi 1 juillet 2021 05:12 À : Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> Cc : ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Objet : Re: [ccnso-council] [Request for Advice] ALAC session at ICANN 71 Good morning Alejandra, Whilst i agree with the general sentiments expressed i would also like to request us to look at the whole issue from different lenses or perspectives. It depicts the 'Communities Understanding' of the ccTLD world. Was it perfect 'No' and understandably so due to the fact that laymen were discussing governance of country code Top Level Domain Registries from their 'lenses' I view this as a great way of outreach despite the fact that it did not meet most of our expectations. It also demonstrates the interest in the work of the ccNSO. The fact that the session was anchored on Katrina's presentation shined a spotlight on the work of the ccNSO which certainly came with its own gravitas. Furthermore as the ICANN Community grows and opens up, we will see cases of people determined to speak about issues they are passionate about which definitely requires the right guidance. Viewing it from the lenses of a 'techie', it may have been disappointing. From an outreach perspective, it may have positive impact. Looking at the numbers in the recently published ICANN 71 Stats, i can posit that there may have been something useful that attracted such a large participation of Community members in the session. Might we attempt to have an evidence based approach to come up with conclusions on the efficacy of the session? That said, there are many organizational aspects that can be improved on should there be a repeat of the session in future. Thank you Best Regards On 2021-06-30 21:37, Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council wrote:
Dear All
As usual the MPC met one day after the conclusion of the ICANN meeting to review what went well, what can be improved and how to prepare for the next ICANN meeting from a ccNSO perspective.
One of the items discussed was the "At-Large Policy Session 2: ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies From At-Large End Users" (https://go.icann.org/3w8Mqxg)
Several comments were made, including:
* Confusion as to why would ALAC host a ccTLD governance session and have people who do not work at the ccTLDs be the ones explaining how specific ccTLDs work. * If ALAC wanted to know more about ccTLDs it would have been better to hear it from the ccTLDs. The issue was that not all testimonials were factually correct i.e accusations were made on the basis of mis-representations and lack of understanding. * End users were supposed to talk about their experiences with their ccTLDs, not to explain how the ccTLD worked, nor on the perceived issues in the country between a ccTLD from a related territory and the government.
The general feelings of those attending the MPC meeting was that the session was of low quality due to lack of preparation, and some argued that in hindsight we [the ccNSO] shouldn't have participated as they felt that by participating the ccNSO gave credence to the session.
This is a small sample of comments, but I can see how others from our community might be just as confused and upset as a result of the session. Therefore, how do you propose we proceed with this matter? Should I write to the ALAC Chair? If so, what should be the goal and content of the message? Do nothing? Do you have another suggestion?
Please advise, preferably by Monday 5 of July.
Best regards, Alejandra
--
Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt
P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt
18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala
www.gt [1]
Links: ------ [1] http://www.gt/ _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.