All, I'm cancelling the council call set for noon utc 24th. Several council members have indicated they will be unable to attend the call. I am suffering from a bad cold that I picked up at the IGF. I will work with Gabi, Bart and Kristina over the next couple of days to send out a series of resolutions to the list so we can move forward on a number of issues. Apologies for the inconvenience. Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA Sent from my phone On 24/11/2009, at 2:28, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Patricio, Thanks. With regard to “Tech day WG”: this term is still widely used as well. They refer to themselves as the Tech WG ( se charter). With regard to adding context to the Wildcard study group, suggest to await tomorrow council call and pending the sense of the meeting adopt the statement conditionally of adding the section on context a s proposed. Kind regards, Bart
On 11/23/09 3:09 PM, "Patricio Poblete" <ppoblete@nic.cl> wrote:
Dear all,
In 4.2, I believe it is not correct to refer to the working group as "Tech Day WG", as its duties include much more than just the Tech Day.
About 4.1 (Wildcard Study Group" or "Redirection Study Group"), I think there should be a "Context" paragraph before the "Purpose", to understand why we believe this study group is necessary. For example, it could begin by stating that the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) has determined that "the redirection and synthesizing of DNS responses by TLDs poses a clear and significant danger to the security and stability of the domain name system", that the ICANN Board has requested the ccNSO to "provide a report on mechanisms that could be employed to ensure that redirection and synthesis at the top level is effectively prohibited", and that, with few exceptions, most ccTLDs do not use redirection. Within this context, the "Purpose" of the study group could be to provide an overview of the dangers generated by the use of redirection, an analysis of the reasons given by the ccTLDs that make use of redirection and a proposed course of action.
Patricio
Gabriella Schittek wrote: Updated Council Agenda with preparation material Dear Councillors,
The ccNSO Council Agenda has been slightly updated. Please, find the updated version below together with some comments and relevant documents attached.
The updated Agenda will also be posted at ccnso.icann.org/calendar.
Kind regards,
Gabi
Draft Agenda Council Call 24 November 2009
1) Confirmation of Approval of Minutes and Actions from Council call 13th October 2009
See http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/minutes-council-13oct09-en.pdf
2) Letter to ICANN Board on SOP Working Group Survey results
See attachment 1.
Background: At its meeting in Seoul, the ccNSO Council agreed to inform the ICANN Board of directors on the results of the survey conducted by the SOP WG. Included is draft letter. The letter to the Board includes the request to publish a clear timeline for community input in future; a brief overview of SOP WG and background of the survey and the highlights of the survey.
Proposed decision: adopt the letter and request chair of the ccNSO to send the letter to the chair of the ICANN Board.
3) ccNSO Council Workshop Nairobi
4) Working Group Update
4.1 Wildcard Study Group – Approval of Statement of Activies and Pur pose
See attachment 3. Background. At the its meeting in Seoul appointed Young Eum Lee and Ondrej Filip as co-chairs of a “wildcard” study group. The first task was to propose a statement of activities and purpose to be adop ted by the Council. After adoption the co-chairs would seek members from the community and set up a liaison with SSAC.
Proposed decision: Adopt proposed statement on purpose and scope of activities for “wildcard” study group, and request the co-chairs to send out a call for volunteers.
4.2 Technical Working Group - Approval of amended Charter
See attachment 2. Background: During the Seoul meeting the tech day working group charter was discussed. According to the Council two issues had to be addressed: Language in the charter relating to observers - Change from ‘lurkers” to “observers”. Secondly new members needed to included. During the Seoul meeting the Tech WG members solicited new members, who were added. The WG in particular looked for people wit h firm technical and/or operational experience.
Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the amended charter, as proposed by the chair of the Tech Day Working Group.
4.3 Delegation & Re-delegation Working Group – Approval of adjusted Charter
See attachment 4.
Background: During the Seoul meeting the delegation, re-delegation and retirement working group discussed extensively its working plan and the associated schedule. As a result the chair of the Working Group, Keith Davidson, requests the ccNSO Council to adjust the charter of the Working Group to reflect the work plan.
Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the proposed charter, as proposed by the chair of the Delegation and Re-delegation Working Group.
5) Liaison Update
5.1 Update from GNSO Liaison
Han Chuan Lee will submit his update closer to the meeting.
5.2 Update from ALAC Liaison
See attachment 5.
6) AOB