How would that be possible to "commit" without a contract ?
ok, unilateral commitment le mercredi 04 mars à 22 H 29 , Olivier Guillard / AFNIC a ecrit :
mmm...
I don't see the interest of that one:
to commit to complying with future IDNA protocol updates.
IDN is about introducing ASCII caracters in the DNS with a special format that will be understood by applications as non ASCII.
I don't see what could do a new registry that could cause any stability problem so I don't see a need "to commit" on anything.
Even less do I see a need for the ccnso to ask for candidates "to commit" on that.
I'm ok with all the rest, but it sound I would abstain for this resolution because of "this required commitment" :
How would that be possible to "commit" without a contract ?
--- Olivier
le mercredi 04 mars à 12 H 00 , Gabriella Schittek a ecrit :
-- Olivier
-- Olivier