Hi all. Notes during today’s Council prep will be taken here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pvxAYb6kUSXazAqoXfuH31wpzrBU9XatpU_jZixT... Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Reply to: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 8 June 2021 at 08:12 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Topic list prep meeting ccNSO Council 8 June 2021 - 18.00 UTC Dear all, Please find included the topic list for today’s prep meeting, Kind regads, Bart ccNSO Council Prep meeting topics 8 June 2021 18.00 UTC 1. Upcoming Roundtable CEO- SO/AC chairs: ICANN71 and a Preview of SOAC Activities Update. What should we mention/discuss? Note item 5 of the included Roundtable agenda. Any comments from Councillors? Agenda of the Roundtable 1. Welcome (David Olive) (2 mins) 2. Introductory Remarks (Goran Marby & Maarten Botterman) (8 mins) 3. Tour de Table – SOAC priorities and expected outcomes from ICANN71 (SOAC Chairs) (35 mins) 4. Overview of Preliminary Survey Results on Returning to In-Person Meetings (Nick Tomasso & David Olive) (10 mins) 5. Questions for Open Discussion (All) (15 mins) i. In light of the preliminary survey results, what level of global representation do you think is necessary in order to go forward with a hybrid meeting? ii. What will you and your various session chairs need to run your meetings in a hybrid format, especially if you (or another session leader/moderator) cannot travel to the US or wish not to do so? iii. What will be the likely impacts (e.g. on effectiveness) on your groups, if some attendees that may otherwise need to be there in person (e.g. Council members or session leaders) are not physically present? What can be done to mitigate any potentially negative impacts? iv. Is there any specific type of feedback that is not covered by the survey but that you think we should try to draw out (if possible) during the ICANN71 session on this topic? 1. Interface for the community to talk about IG and legal proposal (3 mins) 2. Next Steps & Closing (Goran Marby, Maarten Botterman & David Olive) (2 mins) 1. Result Roundtable 1 on WS2 Implementation: support proposal? Concerns, if any with proposal (see slides as circulated and summary notes). 1. Latest ccNSO review, prep for decision. Letter form Larisa Gurnick was cirrcualted to the Council separately. The ccNSO Council will be asked to confirm the status of the implementation work contained in the overview. In summary it states: Of the 14 recommendations issued by the Independent Examiner, the ccNSO proposes: · No further action required (either implemented or about to be fully implemented): · 11 recommendations - numbers 1, 2 (a,b), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13 · Action required by ICANN org: 2 recommendations, numbers 8 ( translation) and 11 (update website) · Deferred/pertains to a future Review: 1 recommendation, number 14 ( granting access to email lists to next Independent reviewer) As stated in the letter, after the ccNSO Council has confirmed the status the overview will be forwarded to the Board Organizational Effectiveness Committee for their consideration. 1. Preparation ALAC session on ccTLD Governance sessions Invite community to attend 1. Preparation Council meeting: * Decision-making on ccPDP3 Retirement: what can you expect? * Decision-making on work plan: what can you expect 1. GRC 2.0: How to organize the continuous organizational improvement process. What do you expect the GRC to do? What is role of Council? Expansion of GRC mandate to include: * working with other committees to discuss implications of those committees work on the guidelines, and how the ccNSO has organized its work. Is mandate of the group still relevant appropriate, needs improvement? * review with the council and make suggestions on an annual basis * perform such additional duties as delegated to the GRC from the council Next steps: provide Direction to GRC & review GRC charter? 1. CSC Effectiveness review: scope, and next steps