And, of course, there is the issue of reviewing NomCom composition (at least to make it a little more balanced: there are ONE position for ccNSO, while there are 7 for gNSO, as just an example). Another point worth of thinking in is that NomCom indicates half of the board... Before ICANN's review, there was 9 voting seats elected via SOs and 5 elected via GA. Now we have 6 elected via SOs, 1 via AtLarge, and 8 via NomCom... best demi On 21/09/2017 11:39, Margarita Valdés Cortés wrote:
Dear Katrina,
When I was particpating in the Nom Com, I remember that we had a workshop with John Jeffrey about all the implication and legal issues about or selection work, specially the legal disabilities and no-no cases.
What if we (you) write to John Jeffrey asking him why this could happen and what we would do in this situation, considering the stressfull situation that we are facing with this new appointee?
The thing is, we can represent this wrong way to appoint this NOM COm ccNSO councilor to the NOM COM Chair and/or reject this selection and ask for the second elegible cantidate?
Regards Margarita