I am in agreement with this suggestion Byron From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: February 7, 2010 8:54 PM To: Burr, Becky Cc: Peter Van Roste; ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2 All, Given the short time frame, can I send in a submission that simply states that the ccNSO council endorses auDA's comments? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA Sent from my phone On 04/02/2010, at 4:30, "Burr, Becky" <Becky.Burr@wilmerhale.com<mailto:Becky.Burr@wilmerhale.com>> wrote: Hello All - I agree it would be good to comment, and I like the auDA comments. But I would add that before there is anything to review, ICANN needs to move forward on enhanced accountability. -) b ________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org> [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Peter Van Roste Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:32 AM To: 'Chris Disspain'; 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2 Hi Chris, I agree, we should use the extra time to file a ccNSO contribution. Thanks for sharing the auDA submission. I think it could indeed be used as a basis for a ccNSO comment. Especially the last part from the auDA submission raises an aspect (composition of RTs and the role of the SO/ACs) that is highly relevant for the ccNSO. Even If we only address this one issue, I believe it is worth to try and get a common statement. Regs, Peter From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org> [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: vrijdag 22 januari 2010 2:58 To: ccNSO Council Subject: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2 Importance: High Hi, 2 things: a) Closing date for comment now extended to 10 February. b) Given that we have more time, is it worth seeing if we can draft a ccNSO comment on the Affirmation Review document perhaps using the auDA one as a starting point? What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo@auda.org.au] Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2010 13:08 To: ccNSO Council Subject: comments on AoC review All, As promised at the last council meeting, attached are the auDA comments on the Affirmation Review document (http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201001.htm#affrev). We will post these in the next day or so. You are welcome to cut and paste any section or sections that you would like to use as well as use the entire document if you wish. Please do post comment and note that the closing date is 31 January. Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4791 (20100120) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4795 (20100121) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4795 (20100121) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2667 - Release Date: 02/04/10 07:35:00