All, Below are the relevant words from the GAC. Our goal would be for the council to pass a resolution tomorrow in similar or the same terms and present this as part of our report to the Board on Thursday morning. If anyone has any comment please send to the list before the council meeting tomorrow. Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> ceo@auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au Relationship between ICANN and IDN ccTLD Operator . IDN ccTLDs should be similarly treated as ASCII ccTLDs. . A documented relationship between ICANN and IDN ccTLD operators should be kept voluntary. . A documented relationship on the basis of the proposed "Documentation of Responsibilities", either as it stands today or in a modified format, may be encouraged but should not be a condition for IDN ccTLD delegations. . As it has always been the case, it's in the best interest of ccTLDs operators and the entire IDN community to adhere to all relevant IETF standards including IDNA protocol, IDN Guidelines and commit to complying with future protocol updates. Financial Contributions . IDN ccTLDs should be similarly treated as ASCII ccTLDs. . Financial contributions should be calculated on a cost recovery basis. Full disclosure and breakdown of the costs involved in the IDN program would be desirable for better understanding of possible cost recovery models. . Financial contributions should be kept voluntary and should not be a condition for IDN ccTLD delegations. . Further information, from ICANN staff, on the different possible cost recovery mechanisms and concrete proposals would help advance positions on the subject.