Hi Bart, On the AoC review team resolution, I suggest that we might consider adding to the resolution a note about the very short time scale for the request for volunteers, which meant that we were not able to implement a formal ccNSO process for this and that we would recommend a longer time frame for this stage for the subsequent reviews. On the financials resolution, I suggest alternative wording for our consideration, as follows: The ccNSO Council notes the gap between current ccTLD contributions to ICANN and the sum attributable to ccTLDs in the recent ICANN expense analysis. The ccNSO Council also notes that ccTLD contributions to ICANN have risen by almost 150% over time. The Council reaffirms the current ICANN ccTLD contribution guidelines, which were developed by the ccNSO in xxxx (insert year) and is committed to entering into dialogue with both the community and ICANN on the issues of ccTLD contributions and ICANN expenses attributable to ccTLDs. Regards, Lesley owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 10/03/2010 08:40:23:
Dear all, Included draft agenda and resolutions. If you want to add something, please let me know, Kind regards, Bart [attachment "Council agenda and resolutions v2.doc" deleted by Lesley Cowley/Nominet]