Re: [ccnso-council] Urgent: Request for input 48-2014: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
Hi Gabi, I don¹t think you mean to revoke¹ the drafting team. Perhaps Invoke¹ or request¹? - and if so, I agree with the suggested action. Kind regards, Lesley From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Monday, 8 September 2014 12:25 To: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Urgent: Request for input 48-2014: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process Dear Councillors, Below is a suggestion from the Triage Committee on how to proceed with the request for input on the Enhancement of the ICANN Accountability Process. Given the urgency of the topic and the relatively short timeframe, I would be grateful if you could let me know in case you disagree with the suggested action by Wednesday, 10 September 2014. Thanks, Gabi == Topic: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process Originator: ICANN Summary of request: ICANN has launched a 21-day Public Comment period starting 6 September 2014, to consider the "Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process" posted on 14 August, in conjunction with the stewardship transition: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en Date received: 6 September 2014 Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 27 September 2014 Recommended action, if any: Revoking drafting team IANA Oversight Transition Coordination Group (who drafted a response on ICANN Accountability in May/June), ask to draft input; Post to email lists for information (done) Expertise needed, if any: Legal, managerial Date of submission to Council: ASAP Last date of Council decision: ASAP Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: High
Oops, so sorry, I actually meant "revive"! Thanks for spotting this. Gabi From: Lesley Cowley <lesley-cowley@hotmail.co.uk> Date: Monday 8 September 2014 13:35 To: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org>, "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Urgent: Request for input 48-2014: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
Hi Gabi,
I don¹t think you mean to revoke¹ the drafting team. Perhaps Invoke¹ or request¹? - and if so, I agree with the suggested action.
Kind regards,
Lesley
From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> Date: Monday, 8 September 2014 12:25 To: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Urgent: Request for input 48-2014: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
Dear Councillors,
Below is a suggestion from the Triage Committee on how to proceed with the request for input on the Enhancement of the ICANN Accountability Process.
Given the urgency of the topic and the relatively short timeframe, I would be grateful if you could let me know in case you disagree with the suggested action by Wednesday, 10 September 2014.
Thanks,
Gabi
==
Topic: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
Originator: ICANN
Summary of request: ICANN has launched a 21-day Public Comment period starting 6 September 2014, to consider the "Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process" posted on 14 August, in conjunction with the stewardship transition: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en
Date received: 6 September 2014
Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 27 September 2014
Recommended action, if any: Revoking drafting team IANA Oversight Transition Coordination Group (who drafted a response on ICANN Accountability in May/June), ask to draft input; Post to email lists for information (done)
Expertise needed, if any: Legal, managerial
Date of submission to Council: ASAP
Last date of Council decision: ASAP
Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: High
participants (2)
-
Gabriella Schittek -
Lesley Cowley