Council Workshop ReportChris: I am aware that liaisons are privy to the Council list. Liaisons should use their judgment when sensitive information comes to their attention and should not make such info public, unless it is seen to be already shared, even with the parties with which they liaise (is that a word?). In this instance I did write to Rudi and Cheryl advising that the Council Workshop report was not a public document and should be kept confidential. Could Gabi please mark any such future documents that are distributed to the Council list as "Confidential"? That would clearly advise the liaisons that the information is not to be shared. Best regards, Ron ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Disspain To: 'Gabriella Schittek' ; 'ccNSO Council' Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:06 PM Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Council Workshop Report Gabi, All, I'm not sure that this document should be public. What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au www.auda.org.au Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gabriella Schittek Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2010 00:34 To: ccNSO Council Subject: [ccnso-council] Council Workshop Report Dear all, Attached is the report from the Council Workshop in Nairobi. It will also be posted at ccnso.icann.org/calendar. Kind regards, Gabi __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4980 (20100328) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4980 (20100328) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com

Hi, owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 29/03/2010 23:06:58:

I?m not sure that this document should be public. What do others think?

I think this should be a private document to the council, but suggest that a summary covering the subject areas discussed could be made public ie what we met to talk about and how we want to improve the functioning of the ccNSO etc, together with the intention to continue these discussions in Brussels. Regards, Lesley

I concur with this approach. Deliver the message, but no need to disseminate the details before they are worked out. Byron ________________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lesley Cowley [lesley@nominet.org.uk] Sent: March 30, 2010 11:06 AM To: Chris Disspain Cc: 'ccNSO Council'; 'Gabriella Schittek'; owner-ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Council Workshop Report Hi, owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 29/03/2010 23:06:58:

I’m not sure that this document should be public. What do others think?

I think this should be a private document to the council, but suggest that a summary covering the subject areas discussed could be made public ie what we met to talk about and how we want to improve the functioning of the ccNSO etc, together with the intention to continue these discussions in Brussels. Regards, Lesley