Just to stress my support, ICANN cannot ask Registrars not to comply with local law, waivers are needed to bypass RAA points that go against, for instance, EU data retention and privacy law. Jordi El 27/03/2014, a les 2:21, Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> va escriure:

Dear Councillors,

Please, email this email list by 31 March in case you do not agree with the Triage recommendation on the 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention.

Thanks,

Gabi

==

Topic: 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention

Originator: ICANN

Summary of request: Some Registrars are seeking an exemption from certain collection and/or retention requirements under the Data Retention Specification (the "Specification") of the 2013 RAA. Section 2 of the Data Retention Specification sets forth requirements regarding the written materials a Registrar must submit in support of its good faith determination that the collection and/or retention of any data element specified in the Specification violates applicable law, and provides that following notice to ICANN of the Waiver Request, ICANN and the applicable Registrar shall discuss the matter in good faith in an effort to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter.

Date received: 22 March 2014

Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 21 April 2014

Recommended action, if any: Post to community for information

Expertise needed, if any: Legal, managerial

Date of submission to Council: 26 March

Last date of Council decision: 28 March

Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low