Fwd: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice
Dear Councillors Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews. Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC Under the current ccNSO Guideline ( https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: 1. Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. 1. During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. 2. The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. 3. *Action*: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. 2. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: 1. *Action*: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. 3. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: 1. the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, 2. the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. 4. *Action*: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. 1. It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. 2. Proposal to set up a *zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC*. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. 3. Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. 5. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra ******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. ******************************************* ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear Members of the ECA, The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period. Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) *Annex D* <https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board *Approval* <https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing. In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws. Sincerely, Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck *Director, Future of Work Project* Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org _______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Might be worth reminding the community that our position on the by law was that we didn’t think it was necessary but were happy to go along with those that thought it was... Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk +44 7880 642456 
On 2 Jun 2026, at 15:22, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councillors
Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews.
Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC
Under the current ccNSO Guideline (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. Action: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. Proposal to set up a zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra
******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. *******************************************
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>
Dear Members of the ECA,
The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period.
Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) Annex D <https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board Approval <https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing.
In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck Director, Future of Work Project Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org <http://www.innovatorsnetwork.org/>_______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. <REJECTION ACTION PETITION NOTICE - ALAC Correspondence to the Board .pdf>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list -- ccnso-council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ccnso-council-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi all I don’t think anything has changed about this situation since we last looked at it. Given we instigated this deferral and review process, I hope we don’t support this petition. And I say that as someone who is, in principle, sympathetic to ALAC’s argument. Our focus should be on making sure that the RoR completes quickly and effectively, in my view. cheers Jordan Sent from Outlook for Mac From: Chris Disspain via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 2 June 2026 at 15:36 To: Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take extra care when replying, clicking links or opening attachments. Might be worth reminding the community that our position on the by law was that we didn’t think it was necessary but were happy to go along with those that thought it was... Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk +44 7880 642456 [PastedGraphic-2.tiff] On 2 Jun 2026, at 15:22, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear Councillors Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews. Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC Under the current ccNSO Guideline (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: 1. Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. * During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. * The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. 2. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. 3. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: * the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, * the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. 4. Action: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. * It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. * Proposal to set up a zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. * Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. 5. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra ******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. ******************************************* ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Dear Members of the ECA, The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period. Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) Annex D<https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board Approval<https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing. In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws. Sincerely, Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck Director, Future of Work Project Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mINTIw65tvHY7iscsBNRIGyg7cwJdc5UHLUpVGFOGe_Mrbr...> _______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. <REJECTION ACTION PETITION NOTICE - ALAC Correspondence to the Board .pdf>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list -- ccnso-council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ccnso-council-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
+1 - I agree with Jordon. See you soon! C Charles Noir Vice President, Community Investment, Policy and Advocacy, CIRA M: 613.897.5307 | cira.ca<http://cira.ca/> CLASSIFICATION:SENSITIVE ________________________________ From: Jordan Carter via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 5:48:46 PM To: Chris Disspain <chris@disspain.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [EXT] [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice Hi all I don’t think anything has changed about this situation since we last looked at it. Given we instigated this deferral and review process, I hope we don’t support this petition. And I say that as someone who is, in principle, sympathetic to ALAC’s argument. Our focus should be on making sure that the RoR completes quickly and effectively, in my view. cheers Jordan Sent from Outlook for Mac From: Chris Disspain via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 2 June 2026 at 15:36 To: Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take extra care when replying, clicking links or opening attachments. Might be worth reminding the community that our position on the by law was that we didn’t think it was necessary but were happy to go along with those that thought it was... Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk +44 7880 642456 [PastedGraphic-2.tiff] On 2 Jun 2026, at 15:22, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear Councillors Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews. Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC Under the current ccNSO Guideline (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: 1. Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. * During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. * The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. 2. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. 3. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: * the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, * the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. 4. Action: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. * It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. * Proposal to set up a zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. * Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. 5. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra ******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. ******************************************* ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Dear Members of the ECA, The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period. Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) Annex D<https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board Approval<https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing. In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws. Sincerely, Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck Director, Future of Work Project Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mINTIw65tvHY7iscsBNRIGyg7cwJdc5UHLUpVGFOGe_Mrbr...> _______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. <REJECTION ACTION PETITION NOTICE - ALAC Correspondence to the Board .pdf>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list -- ccnso-council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ccnso-council-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
That would be Jordan, of course :) Charles Noir Vice President, Community Investment, Policy and Advocacy, CIRA M: 613.897.5307 | cira.ca<http://cira.ca/> CLASSIFICATION:SENSITIVE ________________________________ From: Charles Noir <Charles.Noir@cira.ca> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 6:00:49 PM To: Jordan Carter <Jordan.Carter@nominet.uk>; Chris Disspain <chris@disspain.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [EXT] [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice +1 - I agree with Jordon. See you soon! C Charles Noir Vice President, Community Investment, Policy and Advocacy, CIRA M: 613.897.5307 | cira.ca<http://cira.ca/> ________________________________ From: Jordan Carter via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 5:48:46 PM To: Chris Disspain <chris@disspain.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [EXT] [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice Hi all I don’t think anything has changed about this situation since we last looked at it. Given we instigated this deferral and review process, I hope we don’t support this petition. And I say that as someone who is, in principle, sympathetic to ALAC’s argument. Our focus should be on making sure that the RoR completes quickly and effectively, in my view. cheers Jordan Sent from Outlook for Mac From: Chris Disspain via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 2 June 2026 at 15:36 To: Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take extra care when replying, clicking links or opening attachments. Might be worth reminding the community that our position on the by law was that we didn’t think it was necessary but were happy to go along with those that thought it was... Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk +44 7880 642456 [PastedGraphic-2.tiff] On 2 Jun 2026, at 15:22, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear Councillors Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews. Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC Under the current ccNSO Guideline (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: 1. Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. * During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. * The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. 2. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: * Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. 3. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: * the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, * the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. 4. Action: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. * It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. * Proposal to set up a zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. * Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. 5. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra ******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. ******************************************* ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Dear Members of the ECA, The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period. Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) Annex D<https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board Approval<https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing. In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws. Sincerely, Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck Director, Future of Work Project Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mINTIw65tvHY7iscsBNRIGyg7cwJdc5UHLUpVGFOGe_Mrbr...> _______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org<mailto:ecadmin-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. <REJECTION ACTION PETITION NOTICE - ALAC Correspondence to the Board .pdf>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list -- ccnso-council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ccnso-council-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
…and I too agree with Jordan. Cheers, Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk +44 7880 642456 
On 2 Jun 2026, at 23:01, Charles Noir <Charles.Noir@cira.ca> wrote:
That would be Jordan, of course :)
Charles Noir Vice President, Community Investment, Policy and Advocacy, CIRA M: 613.897.5307 | cira.ca <http://cira.ca/>
CLASSIFICATION:SENSITIVE From: Charles Noir <Charles.Noir@cira.ca> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 6:00:49 PM To: Jordan Carter <Jordan.Carter@nominet.uk>; Chris Disspain <chris@disspain.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [EXT] [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice
+1 - I agree with Jordon.
See you soon! C
Charles Noir Vice President, Community Investment, Policy and Advocacy, CIRA M: 613.897.5307 | cira.ca <http://cira.ca/>
From: Jordan Carter via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 5:48:46 PM To: Chris Disspain <chris@disspain.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [EXT] [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice
Hi all
I don’t think anything has changed about this situation since we last looked at it.
Given we instigated this deferral and review process, I hope we don’t support this petition.
And I say that as someone who is, in principle, sympathetic to ALAC’s argument.
Our focus should be on making sure that the RoR completes quickly and effectively, in my view.
cheers Jordan
Sent from Outlook for Mac From: Chris Disspain via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 2 June 2026 at 15:36 To: Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com> Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Re: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice
Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take extra care when replying, clicking links or opening attachments.
Might be worth reminding the community that our position on the by law was that we didn’t think it was necessary but were happy to go along with those that thought it was...
Cheers,
Chris Disspain chris@disspain.uk
+44 7880 642456
On 2 Jun 2026, at 15:22, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councillors
Below you will find ALAC's submission of a Rejection Action Petition on the Board Approval of the Standard Bylaw Amendment regarding Reviews.
Now they need the active support of one of the other Decisional Participants, within 7 days. This period ends Monday 8 June 23.59 UTC
Under the current ccNSO Guideline (https://ccnso.icann.org/about/guideline-rejection-actions-procedure-24may18-...) the following needs to be done: Upon receipt of a request from another Decisional Participant to support their Rejection Action Petition, the ccNSO Council needs to be notified, the request should be posted on the ccNSO website/wiki, and the ccTLD community informed accordingly. During a three (3) day period directly following the receipt of the request to support a Rejection Action Petition, ccTLD community members may submit their opinion on the merits of the ccNSO becoming a Rejection Action Supporting Decisional Participant. The community will have until Thursday 4 June 23.59 Pacific time (3 days after receipt) to respond. Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager, or the Secretariat on his behalf, should inform the ccTLD community. Immediately upon the conclusion of this community feedback period: Action: The Rejection Action Petition Manager will have the comments received, if any, categorized and summarized, and post the summary to the ccNSO Council list. The ccNSO Council shall convene either in person or via tele-conference no later than the Sunday 7 June at 23.59 UTC to take a decision whether to support the Rejection Action Petition(s) from another Decisional Participant. In making its decision, the ccNSO Council will consider: the feed-back, views, and input received from the ccTLD community regarding the specific Rejection Action Petition, if any, the importance of the matter for the ccTLD community and other factors deemed relevant by the ccNSO Council. Action: Organize a call on Sunday to make a decision. It should be scheduled before the SO/AC Chairs Roundtable which is set for Sunday at 16:00 local time | 14:00 UTC. Proposal to set up a zoom call on Sunday 7 June at 14:30 local time | 12:30 UTC. Unfortunately we won't be able to have a physical room at the venue. Note to follow procedure, we’ll have to wait until the community has been consulted and the Rejection Action Manager has had a chance to summarize the comments, if any. If the ccNSO or other Decisional Participant supports the petition, next steps, including a rejection action community forum, will be organized later. Best regards, Alejandra
******************************************* Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like nobody's listening. And live like it's Heaven on Earth. *******************************************
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jonathan Zuck via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Date: Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 1:17 AM Subject: [ECAdmin] Re: ALAC Rejection Action Petition Notice To: Christian Wheeler via ECAdmin <ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>
Dear Members of the ECA,
The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) hereby submits the attached Rejection Action Petition received during the applicable Rejection Action Petition Period.
Pursuant to Section 2.2(c) Annex D <https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws#annexD> of the ICANN Bylaws, ALAC submits this Rejection Action Petition Notice to the Empowered Community Administration in respect of the ICANN Board Approval <https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> of a Standard Bylaws Amendment to Article 27- Transition Article to Address Specific Reviews, which would suspend ICANN's obligations to conduct Specific Reviews while the community’s Review of Reviews process remains ongoing.
In the ALAC’s view, the proposed amendment would result in an unacceptable erosion of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms and warrants consideration by the Empowered Community under the procedures set out in the ICANN Bylaws.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Zuck, Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Jonathan Zuck Director, Future of Work Project Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org <http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mINTIw65tvHY7iscsBNRIGyg7cwJdc5UHLUpVGFOGe_Mrbr...> _______________________________________________ ECAdmin mailing list -- ecadmin@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ecadmin-leave@icann.org <mailto:ecadmin-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. <REJECTION ACTION PETITION NOTICE - ALAC Correspondence to the Board .pdf>_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list -- ccnso-council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to ccnso-council-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
Alejandra Reynoso Barral -
Charles Noir -
Chris Disspain -
Jordan Carter