Dear all, As you recall, one of the changes envisioned under the 27 May Bylaws is the role of the ccNSO Council with respect to the specific reviews (ATRT, Security and Stability, WHOIS and consumer protection/competition). Assuming that the 27 May Bylaws will become effective, the role of the ccNSO Council and in particular its Chair with respect to the specific reviews will change. Partly this is already covered in the proposed Guideline: ccNSO Nominations to Specific Review Teams (it will be sent to the ccNSO Council for the adoption before our next call on 13 October), if the ccNSO would decide to participate in a specific review. However, as the ccNSO Council we will still need to take some decisions, which are not covered. Recently Chris reached out to the chairs of the SO/ACs to participate in a SO/AC chair call around the Registration Directory Service Review (a.k.a. WHOIS review). It is my understanding that this review is the next one to be launched (after the SSR review which is in its launching phase now) and will be the first one fully under the new framework. According to the 27 May Bylaws 4.6.e (ii), The Board shall cause a periodic review to assess the effectiveness of the then current gTLD registry directory service and whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data. In preparation for the call (as far as I can tell it will be on upcoming Monday but it is not certain yet) I have two questions for you: 1) Do you anticipate a role for the ccNSO/ccTLD community in this specific review? In the previous review we appointed one member (Emily Taylor). It is also my understanding that the broader community is aware that ccTLDs deal with a variety of national data protection and law enforcement regimes and it would be beneficial for the broader community to learn more about our experience. 2) Do you have any specific topics/concerns/views you would like to raise? Please let me know your thoughts by Friday 23rd September! Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
I would like to echo Katrina’s sentiment re the value of cc participation in the Whois review. Real experience – as opposed to sloganeering – would greatly improve the conversation, and cc’s are in a position to provide experience based expertise J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz> From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>> Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM To: "'ccnso-council@icann. org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016) Dear all, As you recall, one of the changes envisioned under the 27 May Bylaws is the role of the ccNSO Council with respect to the specific reviews (ATRT, Security and Stability, WHOIS and consumer protection/competition). Assuming that the 27 May Bylaws will become effective, the role of the ccNSO Council and in particular its Chair with respect to the specific reviews will change. Partly this is already covered in the proposed Guideline: ccNSO Nominations to Specific Review Teams (it will be sent to the ccNSO Council for the adoption before our next call on 13 October), if the ccNSO would decide to participate in a specific review. However, as the ccNSO Council we will still need to take some decisions, which are not covered. Recently Chris reached out to the chairs of the SO/ACs to participate in a SO/AC chair call around the Registration Directory Service Review (a.k.a. WHOIS review). It is my understanding that this review is the next one to be launched (after the SSR review which is in its launching phase now) and will be the first one fully under the new framework. According to the 27 May Bylaws 4.6.e (ii), The Board shall cause a periodic review to assess the effectiveness of the then current gTLD registry directory service and whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data. In preparation for the call (as far as I can tell it will be on upcoming Monday but it is not certain yet) I have two questions for you: 1) Do you anticipate a role for the ccNSO/ccTLD community in this specific review? In the previous review we appointed one member (Emily Taylor). It is also my understanding that the broader community is aware that ccTLDs deal with a variety of national data protection and law enforcement regimes and it would be beneficial for the broader community to learn more about our experience. 2) Do you have any specific topics/concerns/views you would like to raise? Please let me know your thoughts by Friday 23rd September! Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Dear Katrina Yes, I think it is important that the ccTLD community is involved in the WHOIS review since it's one of the services that ccTLDs provide. Also agree with Becky's comments. Best regards, Alejandra *Registro de Dominios .gt* -- Universidad del Valle de Guatemala. 18 Ave. 11-95. Z. 15. V.H. III. Edificio *J*. Oficina *204*. *Tels:* *+502.23688564* y *+502.23688565* * <http://www.gt/> ** <https://www.facebook.com/DominiosGT> <https://twitter.com/DominiosGT> ** <https://plus.google.com/u/0/107159401057178225886/posts> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/registro-de-dominios-gt>* On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:
I would like to echo Katrina’s sentiment re the value of cc participation in the Whois review. Real experience – as opposed to sloganeering – would greatly improve the conversation, and cc’s are in a position to provide experience based expertise
*J. Beckwith Burr* *Neustar, Inc.* / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 *Office:* +1.202.533.2932 *Mobile:* +1.202.352.6367 */* *neustar.biz* <http://www.neustar.biz>
From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM To: "'ccnso-council@icann. org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016)
Dear all,
As you recall, one of the changes envisioned under the 27 May Bylaws is the role of the ccNSO Council with respect to the specific reviews (ATRT, Security and Stability, WHOIS and consumer protection/competition).
Assuming that the 27 May Bylaws will become effective, the role of the ccNSO Council and in particular its Chair with respect to the specific reviews will change. Partly this is already covered in the proposed Guideline: ccNSO Nominations to Specific Review Teams (it will be sent to the ccNSO Council for the adoption before our next call on 13 October), if the ccNSO would decide to participate in a specific review. However, as the ccNSO Council we will still need to take some decisions, which are not covered.
Recently Chris reached out to the chairs of the SO/ACs to participate in a SO/AC chair call around the Registration Directory Service Review (a.k.a. WHOIS review). It is my understanding that this review is the next one to be launched (after the SSR review which is in its launching phase now) and will be the first one fully under the new framework. According to the 27 May Bylaws 4.6.e (ii), The Board shall cause a periodic review to assess the effectiveness of the then current gTLD registry directory service and whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data.
In preparation for the call (as far as I can tell it will be on upcoming Monday but it is not certain yet) I have two questions for you:
1) Do you anticipate a role for the ccNSO/ccTLD community in this specific review?
In the previous review we appointed one member (Emily Taylor). It is also my understanding that the broader community is aware that ccTLDs deal with a variety of national data protection and law enforcement regimes and it would be beneficial for the broader community to learn more about our experience.
2) Do you have any specific topics/concerns/views you would like to raise?
Please let me know your thoughts by Friday 23rd September! Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
Dear Katrina, I agree with Alejandra. Best regards, Christelle Vaval cs logoCabinet Salès 62, rue Geffrard (angle rue Chavannes) HT 6140, Pétion-Ville, Haiti Tél: (509) 2815-1500 Fax: (509) 2256-5107 Email: <mailto:cvaval@cabinetsales.com> cvaval@cabinetsales.com Pensez-y avant d’imprimer. | Think before printing. AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ - Ce message est pour l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus. Il peut contenir de l'information privilégiée, propriétaire, confidentielle et/ou dispensée de divulgation par la loi. Si vous n'êtes pas un destinataire nommé ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur et l'effacer sans le copier ni le divulguer à quiconque, ni n'en faire aucun usage. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This communication is for the exclusive use of the above-named recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged, proprietary, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure by law. If you are not the intended recipient or have received it in error, immediately notify the sender and delete it without copying it, disclosing it to anyone or making any use of it. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD - Este mensaje es para el uso exclusivo del (de los) destinatario(s) indicados más arriba y puede tener información privilegiada, propietaria, confidencial y/o legalmente no divulgable. Si usted no es un destinatario de este mensaje o lo recibe por error, se le pide avisar inmediatamente al remitente y eliminar el mensaje sin copiarlo, divulgarlo o hacer cualquier otro uso del mismo. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:13 PM To: Katrina Sataki Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Burr, Becky Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016) Dear Katrina Yes, I think it is important that the ccTLD community is involved in the WHOIS review since it's one of the services that ccTLDs provide. Also agree with Becky's comments. Best regards, Alejandra Registro de Dominios .gt -- Universidad del Valle de Guatemala. 18 Ave. 11-95. Z. 15. V.H. III. Edificio J. Oficina 204. Tels: +502.23688564 y +502.23688565 <http://www.gt/> <https://www.facebook.com/DominiosGT> <https://twitter.com/DominiosGT> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/107159401057178225886/posts> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/registro-de-dominios-gt> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote: I would like to echo Katrina’s sentiment re the value of cc participation in the Whois review. Real experience – as opposed to sloganeering – would greatly improve the conversation, and cc’s are in a position to provide experience based expertise J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 <tel:%2B1.202.533.2932> Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 <tel:%2B1.202.352.6367> / <http://www.neustar.biz> neustar.biz From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM To: "'ccnso-council@icann. org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016) Dear all, As you recall, one of the changes envisioned under the 27 May Bylaws is the role of the ccNSO Council with respect to the specific reviews (ATRT, Security and Stability, WHOIS and consumer protection/competition). Assuming that the 27 May Bylaws will become effective, the role of the ccNSO Council and in particular its Chair with respect to the specific reviews will change. Partly this is already covered in the proposed Guideline: ccNSO Nominations to Specific Review Teams (it will be sent to the ccNSO Council for the adoption before our next call on 13 October), if the ccNSO would decide to participate in a specific review. However, as the ccNSO Council we will still need to take some decisions, which are not covered. Recently Chris reached out to the chairs of the SO/ACs to participate in a SO/AC chair call around the Registration Directory Service Review (a.k.a. WHOIS review). It is my understanding that this review is the next one to be launched (after the SSR review which is in its launching phase now) and will be the first one fully under the new framework. According to the 27 May Bylaws 4.6.e (ii), The Board shall cause a periodic review to assess the effectiveness of the then current gTLD registry directory service and whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data. In preparation for the call (as far as I can tell it will be on upcoming Monday but it is not certain yet) I have two questions for you: 1) Do you anticipate a role for the ccNSO/ccTLD community in this specific review? In the previous review we appointed one member (Emily Taylor). It is also my understanding that the broader community is aware that ccTLDs deal with a variety of national data protection and law enforcement regimes and it would be beneficial for the broader community to learn more about our experience. 2) Do you have any specific topics/concerns/views you would like to raise? Please let me know your thoughts by Friday 23rd September! Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
participants (4)
-
Alejandra Reynoso -
Burr, Becky -
Christelle Vaval -
Katrina Sataki