FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday). Looks fine to me. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 | <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Chris, The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. Stéphane - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie: - What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO, Nominet http://www.nominet.org.uk/ From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au>> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday). Looks fine to me. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: 1300 732 929<tel:1300%20732%20929> | F: 03 8341 4112<tel:03%208341%204112> E: ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> | W:www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/> auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Chris, The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. Stéphane - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
Yup. Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA Sent from my phone On 14/03/2011, at 9:25, Lesley Cowley <lesley@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie: - What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
- Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?
- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?
Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO, Nominet http://www.nominet.org.uk/
From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday).
Looks fine to me.
Cheers,
Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au
auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator
Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
Chris,
The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.
We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.
Stéphane
- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.
- What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?
- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?
- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?
- Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
May be we can also add: - What does the GNSO anticipate to be overlaps in relation to representation where a cc also runs a gTLD (because in such a case that means the same cc will be both a ccNSO & a gNSO member)? Does this mean the need for the ccNSO & gNSO meetings & collaborations will even be more justified? Regards, Vika Mpisane ZADNA +27 11 275 0082 From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lesley Cowley Sent: 14 March 2011 12:25 AM To: Chris Disspain; ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie: - What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO, Nominet http://www.nominet.org.uk/ From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday). Looks fine to me. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 | <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Chris, The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. Stéphane - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
We can also add: What is the gNSO position to a TLD organisation that wants to run a new gTLD? (Of course, these questions will also need the ccNSO as well to formulate its views). Vika From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Vika Mpisane Sent: 14 March 2011 02:16 AM To: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow May be we can also add: - What does the GNSO anticipate to be overlaps in relation to representation where a cc also runs a gTLD (because in such a case that means the same cc will be both a ccNSO & a gNSO member)? Does this mean the need for the ccNSO & gNSO meetings & collaborations will even be more justified? Regards, Vika Mpisane ZADNA +27 11 275 0082 From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lesley Cowley Sent: 14 March 2011 12:25 AM To: Chris Disspain; ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie: - What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO, Nominet http://www.nominet.org.uk/ From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday). Looks fine to me. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 | <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Chris, The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. Stéphane - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
Hi, The GNSO project list and respective status is posted at their website here: http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf and I have attached it to this email. It is quite a substantial list and would give us some background to the first question on ccNSO input/feedback. Regards Han Chuan ----- Original Message ----- From: Lesley Cowley To: Chris Disspain ; ccNSO Council Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:25 AM Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Could we ask some of these as 'mirror' questions ie: - What is the GNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct ccNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the GNSO see value in meeting with the ccNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the GNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO, Nominet http://www.nominet.org.uk/ From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:15:20 +1100 To: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow See below for suggested agenda for our lunch with gnso tomorrow (Monday). Looks fine to me. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W:www.auda.org.au auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2011 15:26 To: Chris Disspain Subject: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow Chris, The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. Stéphane - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5948 (20110312) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5950 (20110313) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
participants (4)
-
Chris Disspain -
Han Chuan, Lee -
Lesley Cowley -
Vika Mpisane