I will abstain for obvious reasons. Nevertheless, I would like my fellow councillors to know we’ve been discussing this as a work item in the GRC over the next cycle. Me

On Nov 3, 2022, at 08:20, Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all As you know the retirement policy was adopted by the Board at it meeting during ICANN75. ICANN org / IAAN staff will start the implementation. As you will recall for the last Council meeting, the Review Mechanism and IDN policy are expected to be completed next year andl be submitted to the Board. At some point they will need to be implemented as well.

As you also know the ccNSO does not have any experience on how to organize its role , if any with respect to implementation of policy proposals. As discussed and given that in the near future various policies will need to be implemented, it is advised to develop a process/procedure on how to handle implementation of ccNSO policies from a ccNSO perspective.

These internal procedure could be developed by either: the ccNSO Council the GRC new working group Given its mandate, experience , working methods, and track record the GRC is probably best positioned to take on this work item, and preliminary discussions indicated that they are willing to do so.

Decision required: The Council request the ccNSO Guideline Review Committee to develop and propose to the community and ccNSO Counci a ccNSO internal procedure or Guideline on role and expectations from the ccNSO and/or ccNSO group with respect to the implementation of a ccNSO recommended policy as adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors,. The GRC is requested to look at already existing procedures, developed by the GNSO (see Implementation review team Principles and Guidelines, https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/ir... ) and similar procedures and documentation from ICANN org.

Please respond on list if you have any questions or concerns by Monday 7 November 2022. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Thank you Bart, I support this. Thanks in advance to GRC! Cheers Jordan _______ Jordan Carter Internet Governance and Policy Director jordan.carter@auda.org.au<mailto:jordan.carter@auda.org.au> +61 417 243 647 From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council Sent: Friday, 4 November 2022 2:20 AM To: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [ccnso-council] Decision: Request GRC to develop ccNSO internal procedure on role and expectations of ccNSO or ccNSO group with respect to implementation of ccPDP recommended policy Dear all As you know the retirement policy was adopted by the Board at it meeting during ICANN75. ICANN org / IAAN staff will start the implementation. As you will recall for the last Council meeting, the Review Mechanism and IDN policy are expected to be completed next year andl be submitted to the Board. At some point they will need to be implemented as well. As you also know the ccNSO does not have any experience on how to organize its role , if any with respect to implementation of policy proposals. As discussed and given that in the near future various policies will need to be implemented, it is advised to develop a process/procedure on how to handle implementation of ccNSO policies from a ccNSO perspective. These internal procedure could be developed by either: * the ccNSO Council * the GRC * new working group Given its mandate, experience , working methods, and track record the GRC is probably best positioned to take on this work item, and preliminary discussions indicated that they are willing to do so. Decision required: The Council request the ccNSO Guideline Review Committee to develop and propose to the community and ccNSO Counci a ccNSO internal procedure or Guideline on role and expectations from the ccNSO and/or ccNSO group with respect to the implementation of a ccNSO recommended policy as adopted by the ICANN Board of Directors,. The GRC is requested to look at already existing procedures, developed by the GNSO (see Implementation review team Principles and Guidelines, https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/irt-principles-guidelines-23aug16-en.pdf<https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Ffile%2Ffield-file-attach%2F2016-12%2Firt-principles-guidelines-23aug16-en.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cjordan.carter%40auda.org.au%7C50a430fd84284c65b97508dabdaef069%7C81810bc45d6845f6ba4e3d6c9fb37e43%7C0%7C0%7C638030856766721239%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=T1WRYlJLJjy9Yyh%2BT5IElTOzat4GnTuwqZzfE71%2Fd5E%3D&reserved=0> ) and similar procedures and documentation from ICANN org. Please respond on list if you have any questions or concerns by Monday 7 November 2022.