NOTES | PGA WG | 4 March 2025 1. Welcome and roll call Welcome by Maria 2. Administrative matters a. SoI Any updates? None Fill out the ccNSO Statement of Interest form: https://forms.gle/79Jw4wSnNhn5W4Z46 . Once processed by the Secretariat, you can check your SOI here: https://community.icann.org/x/doAFEgRead here the ccNSO SOI Guideline: https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/ccnso-internal-pr... b. Update Workplan For discussion during the PGA work session over the weekend Group might need to meet one or 2 meetings after ICANN82. Report to council https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OOP7lbO9xfoyz09zn1SPBUpEZU5NLmtcgZeyQD-s... 3. First reading updated proposal priorities Please check the document before the meeting. If you have any comments make observations in suggestion mode. Proposed priority items for study group - First Reading (for 4 March 2025 PGA-WG meeting) <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OOP7lbO9xfoyz09zn1SPBUpEZU5NLmtcgZeyQD-s...> Stephen: ccPDP3. ccTLD subject to a retirement effort. But there is no review mechanism in place. Due to board inaction. That is not fair to ccTLDs. Bart: sth for further discussion. Peter: i will respond to Stephen in Seattle. The iana contract is sth we might want to look at. We need to start somewhere. No optimal order to address this. This looks like low hanging fruit, and contained or scoped problem statement. Nonetheless it would be good not to pre-empt anything that would be a potential result from the broader scope questions Bart; what is meant by that? Peter: since this is low hanging fruit, there is high hanging fruit Bart: to avoid misunderstanding. The low hanging fruit is only disaster recovery. The first topic is definitely not low hanging fruit. To avoid misunderstanding. Peter: there was significant confusion on the order in the survey. These are our testing cases. They are rather scoped in a way. The plea is to make sure that we do not bind ourselves by outcomes that might bite back when we go to the broader issues Bart: suggest. There is an understanding that - see intro part, groupings of issues - you already see a broader description. Summary of the work done by the group to date on the mentimeter polling and discussions. Before we do anything, the WG need to be chartered properly. Clear identifiable deliverables to manage the work. Peter: Council can take that into consideration Bart: they have to. Otherwise overload. Green marks. Prioritisation item on agenda is now completed. 4. Additional Topics for Gap Analysis? Bart: see gap suggested by Stephen No further suggestions. Bart: we will add it for discussion during the working session in Seattle. If anybody has additional gaps, please send them to the PGA mailing list 5. In-person meeting topics: a. Final reading prioritization b. Additional gaps (added) c. What to present to the community? d. What to present to the GAC e. Consolidated Overview Applicable policies f. Next steps 6. Next meeting PGA work session Saturday, 8 March 2025 | 09:00-10:00 local (-8 UTC) Community update Tuesday, 11 March | 16:30-17:30 local (UTC -7) Update GAC Wednesday, 12 March | 10:30-12:00 local (UTC -7) Group will meet again post ICANN82, probably resuming end March 7. AOB none 8. Adjourn Bey all Joke Braeken joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Read more about the ccNSO at ICANN82: https://bit.ly/4h4E8Ot