I asked (up thread):
In this scenario, who is ICANN suing?
I see. After (assuming it happens) the transition from the current NTIA-ICANN fact pattern, in some subsequent future transition, from a situation we don't yet know to some other situation we also don't yet know, the current ICANN, hypothesized to be the IANA Functions operator after the current contract (and possibly its one, or two extensions), will sue some other entity to prevent that other entity from becoming the IANA Functions operator. I'm clear now. The scenario addresses a potential transition after the transition-possibly-in-progress. Thanks for the clarification. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon On 1/14/15 3:30 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Hello all,
On 14/01/2015 23:07, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
I think this is the last question I will ask about #23. Sorry I came a little late on this but I think I explained my thinking in a message just a moment ago. I was *not* speaking about the back-end operator. I was speaking about the "IANA operator" thus ICANN at present.
Kind regards,
Olivier