Please find attached a suggested draft for a stress test on whether ICANN is a general content regulator, based on stress test 29 (as it existed in the Second Draft Report). Personally, I don't think this should be a new stress test; I think this is a mere refinement and clarification of stress test 29. It is the proposal from the ST-WP, which addresses entirely separate concerns, that should be the new stress test. But as long as this is accepted as a stress test, what number it is isn't important. Anyway, as you heard earlier, the text Becky presented about "clarifying" the limit on ICANN's ability to regulate Internet content is contested. Earlier this afternoon I sent a proposed revision to the wp2 mailing list to attempt to resolve that. Provided my proposal to Becky is accepted, I think the assessment that the current proposal satisfies the stress test remains valid; if it is not, we will need to consider it anew. Malcolm. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA