Just a note to the Stress Test work party about tomorrow’s call (11 UTC) and preparing our next draft for public comment. The attached document notes stress test items gathered from queries, requests, and filed comments since 3-May. This is a very manageable task. However, there are many stress test items in the ICANN Legal/ICANN Board letter that came to us on 19-Jun (link<http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/201...>). Have not yet had time to analyze those, and welcome your help there as well. Also, Malcolm Hutty wrote us about Stress Test #23 and the various enforcement models under consideration (Member, Designator, etc.) See Malcolm’s note below and his attached analysis. Would be great to discuss on our call. Best, Steve From: Malcolm Hutty Date: Monday, June 29, 2015 at 7:09 AM To: "ccwg-accountability4@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-accountability4@icann.org>" Subject: [ST-WP] Analysis for Stress Test 23 Dear all, I hope you had a safe and comfortable trip back from Buenos Aires, those of you who were there. On my way back I spent some of the time writing up an analysis of how the CCWG proposal performs against stress test 23, under each of the models currently being discussed. The heart of this is a process diagram flow-chart. You may have to use zoom to read the text on the diagram; there is table of notes that explains each box on the diagram. I hope you find this a useful, Kind Regards, Malcolm. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/