Dear Olga, Regarding today’s CCWG New gTLD Auction Proceeds call: Date/Time: Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 14:00 UTC for 90 minutes Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/newgtlds-auction Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org On 24/08/2017, 16:34, "ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Olga Cavalli" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org on behalf of olgacavalli@gmail.com> wrote: hi can you swnd me the link for adobe? Im not in my office thanks > El 24 ago 2017, a las 10:24, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> escribió: > > Please note that as communicated in my email that the survey was opened until 22.00 UTC yesterday and subsequently closed again. > > Best regards, > > Marika > > On 8/24/17, 07:23, "喬敬" <chiao@brandma.co> wrote: > > the survey page says it's closed now.... > >> On 8/24/17, Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> wrote: >> Yes, keep it open Marika! >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Not having seen any immediate objections, I’ve gone ahead and re-opened >>> the survey. Please submit your responses by 22.00 UTC at the latest. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Carolina >>> Caeiro <carolina@lacnic.net> >>> *Date: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 14:24 >>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate - >>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Are there any problems with re-opening the survey for a couple extra >>> hours, say 10:00PM UTC? I was awaiting for some feedback and missed the >>> deadline for some 20 minutes. I think this should still give us >>> sufficient >>> time for review ahead of tomorrow's meeting and some other group members >>> might be in a similar situation? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Carolina >>> >>> >>> >>> El 23/8/17 a las 15:14, Marika Konings escribió: >>> >>> Please note that this poll has now been closed. You are encouraged to >>> review the results ahead of tomorrow’s meeting here: >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_re... >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_re...>. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings >>> <marika.konings@icann.org> <marika.konings@icann.org> >>> *Date: *Monday, August 21, 2017 at 12:03 >>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate - >>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds >>> >>> >>> >>> Reminder – please participate in the poll if you have not done so yet. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings >>> <marika.konings@icann.org> <marika.konings@icann.org> >>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 06:12 >>> *To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> >>> <jrobinson@afilias.info>, >>> 'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>, "Xavier >>> J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez@icann.org> <xavier.calvez@icann.org> >>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Please participate - survey re. whether >>> ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds >>> >>> >>> >>> Jonathan, thank you for your suggestion and others for chiming in. In >>> consultation with the leadership team, staff has put together a short >>> survey to obtain CCWG input on the questions you have outlined below >>> which >>> will hopefully help inform the CCWG deliberations on this topic. To >>> participate in the survey, please go to https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_&d... >>> r/HRRV93W[surveymonkey.com] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_...>. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> You are requested to provide your input by Wednesday 23 August at 18.00 >>> UTC at the latest. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson >>> <jrobinson@afilias.info> <jrobinson@afilias.info> >>> *Organization: *Afilias >>> *Reply-To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> >>> <jrobinson@afilias.info> >>> *Date: *Friday, August 11, 2017 at 03:11 >>> *To: *'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>, >>> "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez@icann.org> <xavier.calvez@icann.org> >>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's >>> CCWG-AP meeting >>> >>> >>> >>> All, >>> >>> >>> >>> A couple of thoughts on this topic. >>> >>> >>> >>> On the subject of whether or not ICANN should have a 12 month operating >>> expense reserve in place. >>> >>> Agreed that it seems to be common practice in the not for profit sector. >>> >>> Whether or not it should be the case for ICANN is an interesting >>> question, >>> but agreed, not one for this CWG. >>> >>> >>> >>> In any event, Xavier has clarified that the current policy is that the >>> level of operating reserve should be 12 months. >>> >>> My understanding of the question for this group is not whether or not we >>> would sanction the (auction fund) money being used to top up the >>> reserves. >>> >>> But rather, whether or not we would like to see rules in place that >>> sanction ICANN (the organisation) applying for auction funds. >>> >>> >>> >>> In evaluating that question of ICANN the organisation as a prospective >>> applicant, a use or test case for that consideration is ICANN applying >>> (under the same rules as anyone else) for auction funds to top up the >>> ICANN >>> reserve funds. >>> >>> >>> >>> My personal view is that ICANN should be demonstrating a commitment to >>> fulfilling its current policy (to have in place a 12 month reserve) by >>> budgeting an operating surplus to build that reserve. >>> >>> In addition (independently of this CWG), ICANN should review its current >>> policy on reserve funds. >>> >>> If these two criteria were met, it would make me personaly much more >>> sympathetic to potentially topping up reserve funds (to some extent) with >>> auction funds. >>> >>> >>> >>> At the risk of being repetitive, it seems to me that the question for >>> this >>> CWG remains: >>> >>> - Whether or not ICANN the Organisation should be permitted to apply >>> for funds? >>> and >>> - If so, what constraints should be place on this (use of funds, >>> quantum etc)? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com >>> <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>] >>> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:18 AM >>> *To:* Xavier J. Calvez <xavier.calvez@icann.org> >>> <xavier.calvez@icann.org> >>> *Cc:* ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's >>> CCWG-AP meeting >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> Xavier is right about reserve that covers operational expenses for >>> minimum >>> is say 12 month being normal practice. Some even do it for more; some >>> RIRs >>> have way above 1 year already while others are working towards same. >>> However ofcourse none can match the fat figures of ICANN budget. ;-) >>> >>> >>> >>> However I don't think auction proceeds in this context can be referred to >>> as surplus that can get ploughed back to achieve reserve target set by >>> ICANN management NOR do I think it is a target/goal that this group >>> should >>> try to achieve. >>> >>> >>> >>> I for will suggest that we should consider mechanisms that allow some >>> community projects that ICANN normally fund in their budget to be >>> eligible, >>> which if approved (based on the process) may then result to more >>> surpluses >>> to ICANN and they(Board) can decide to put that to reserve. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my mobile >>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 10, 2017 10:26 PM, "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez@icann.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I apologize if I did not make the following clear: ICANN’s current policy >>> is to have in place a reserve fund equivalent to at minimum 12 months of >>> operating expenses. Refer to ICANN’s Investment Policy, see at >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources... >>> policy-2014-07-30-en[icann.org] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources...>, >>> see the paragraph “Size of Funds”, copied below). >>> >>> >>> >>> “The Reserve Fund shall contain any amounts not contained in the >>> Operating >>> Fund. Any surplus funds will be used to build up the Reserve Fund to a >>> balance sufficient to cover an emergency requirement. The Reserve Fund is >>> expected to reach and maintain a level of funds to maintain a minimum of >>> 12 >>> months of expected expenditures.“ >>> >>> >>> >>> I indicated that this level of a reserve fund is the commonly used in >>> non-profit organizations. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> >>> >>> Xavier >>> >>> >>> >>> Xavier Calvez >>> >>> ICANN – SVP & CFO >>> >>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 >>> >>> Los Angeles, CA 90094 >>> >>> Phone: 310-301-5838 <(310)%20301-5838> >>> >>> Mobile: 805-312-0052 <(805)%20312-0052> >>> >>> Fax: 310-957-2348 <(310)%20957-2348> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Alan >>> Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> >>> *Date: *Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:41 PM >>> *To: *Dietmar Stefitz <djs@bemarnet.es>, Michael Karanicolas < >>> mkaranicolas@gmail.com>, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> >>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's >>> CCWG-AP meeting >>> >>> >>> >>> To be clear, I don't think anyone on the call suggested we build up the >>> reserve to a 12 or 24 month level of current budget. Xavier said that 1 >>> year was a typical norm for non-profits, but in my opinion, there is no >>> need for that, as in the case of emergency, costs could be ramped down >>> quickly. >>> >>> I vaguely recall that the level that we were targeting (before the drain >>> from the CCWG-Acct expenses) was something like $80m. So even if we >>> contributed enough to get back to that level, it would be perhaps $40m. >>> >>> But the issue in my mind is not how much, but if. >>> >>> Alan >>> >>> At 10/08/2017 03:28 PM, Dietmar Stefitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Erika and all, >>> >>> I have been very astonished to hear the proposal to use the Auction Money >>> in filling up the reserve account of ICANN. >>> Filling up for 12 month reserve or 24 month reserve, if we have to take >>> 24 >>> month, there will not be much left to disburse to other projects. >>> >>> I thought that the call from Xavier has been to explain specially the >>> Investment of the fund at this moment, for which I can only congratulate. >>> A 1% return on a super save investment is not bad, and it should be made >>> like this in the future. >>> >>> I would absolutely be against a filling up of the reserve fund from the >>> auction proceeds, at least as a decision from this group. >>> Or did I misunderstand something? >>> >>> Dietmar Stefitz >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thursday, August 10, 2017, 8:05:56 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *MK> Hi Kavouss, MK> Am I missing something - or are you suggesting that >>> the CCWG should MK> only determine whether or not money be fed into >>> ICANN's >>> reserve MK> account, without also indicating what proportion should be >>> used >>> to MK> that effect? MK> If so - I don't see how the CCWG could consider >>> anything beyond that MK> simple yes/no question, as we'd have no >>> indication >>> how much money we MK> would have leftover to work with, once the reserve >>> is >>> replenished. MK> Decisions about allocation priorities can't really be >>> made >>> unless we MK> also look at how the pie should be portioned out, right? >>> MK> >>> Michael Karanicolas MK> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Kavouss Arasteh >>> MK> <* kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *> wrote: >> Dear Erika, Dear All, >> Today during the last 15 mints of >>> the call I tried to draw your attention to >> allow me to intervene on >>> the >>> views expressed by Alan reading the Reserve >> account. >> If I have well >>> understood his statement he wanted that CCWG discuss the >> level of >>> ICANN >>> reserve account which was announced by Xavier to be >> equivalent to one >>> year budget as objective. As Xavier mentioned this level >> has not been >>> reached. >> Alan’s view that CCWG discuss the level of ICANN reserve >>> account is outside* >>> * >> the mandate of CCWG. We may just decide whether or not that account >>> be fed* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * >> by using Auction money but decision on the appropriate level of the >>> reserve >> account is totally outside or mandate as it is a decision to >>> be >>> made by the >> Board and not by this group >> Regards >> Kavouss >> On >>> Thu, >>> Aug 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Joke Braeken <*joke.braeken@icann.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *> >> wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> Please find below the notes and action >>> items from today’s CCWG-AP meeting.* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Best regards,* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Joke Braeken* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Notes CCWG – AP Meeting 10 August 2017:* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate >>> through the* >>> >>> >>> * >>> content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the >>> transcript >>> and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are >>> provided >>> separately and >>> are posted on the wiki at: * >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_D... >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_D...> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *. >>> Roll Call >>> Please state your name for transcription purposes >>> and >>> keep microphones on >>> mute when not speaking. >>> Attendance will be >>> taken from the AdobeConnect room. >>> Welcome – DOI* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Overview from Xavier Calvez on investment management >>> The >>> intention of this presentation is >>> to allow the group to think on the >>> issue of investment, >>> to understand ICANN's practice, and to answer >>> any >>> questions that might be >>> raised. >>> It helps to inform the discussion >>> on the ROI of the fund; It includes an >>> overview of how the auction >>> proceeds are currently managed, which might lead >>> to how they might be >>> managed in the future. >>> Important to note: >>> only conservative >>> investment policies are being used >>> the investment strategy will be >>> designed in support of the objectives >>> An overview of some >>> illustrative >>> investment scenarios was provided, >>> followed by Q&A. >>> Parameters >>> that >>> need to be considered: >>> amount of money >>> horizon >>> level of risk >>> (which is not correlated to the horizon) >>> Financial information is >>> regularly provided during the quarterly >>> stakeholder calls. >>> >>> (amount >>> from latest update - Q3 data of FY17. *>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_&d=DwIFaQ... >>> quarterlyreports[icann.org] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_quarterly...> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *) >>> Reserve Fund: 64 million >>> New gTLD unspent application fees: >>> 128 >>> million >>> Auction proceeds: 233 million >>> Annual budget of ICANN. >>> FY18 >>> budget expenses 142 million USD. >>> Regarding replenishing the reserve >>> fund: appropriate procedures need to be >>> taken, appropriate approvals >>> and decisions need to be in place for it to be >>> legal. >>> This is >>> however a moral question as well. The charter does include this >>> >>> question: “To what extent (and, if so, how) could ICANN, the >>> Organization >>> or* >>> * >>> a constituent part thereof, be the beneficiary of some of the >>> auction funds†* >>> >>> * >>> The group needs to discuss this at a later stage.* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Next meeting* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> next CCWG-AP meeting is scheduled for Thursday 24 August at 14.00 >>> UTC* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> = = = = >>> Action item #1: >>> CCWG to review the slides presented >>> by Xavier (published on *>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_&d=... >>> display/CWGONGAP/2017-08-10+CCWG+New+gTLD+Auction+ >>> Proceeds+call[community.icann.org] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...> >>> *) >>> and to share any further questions for Xavier on the group’s >>> mailing list.* >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> Action item #2:* >>> >>> * >>> Per the discussion during the CCWG-AP meeting on 27 July 2017, the* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> attached mind map was developed, which aims to regroup the >>> objectives based >>> on the survey results as well as the subsequent >>> discussions. The CCWG is >>> encouraged to continue to provide feedback >>> on >>> the proposed regrouping of >>> objectives/priorities, as well as the >>> clustering of examples ahead of the >>> next meeting, scheduled for 24 >>> August at 14 UTC. >>> Action item #3: >>> CCWG to review responses to >>> charter question #4 and to continue the >>> discussion on the mailing >>> list. >>>>>> (see *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_re... >>> surveymonkey.com] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_re...> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * ) >>> = = = = >>> Joke Braeken >>> ccNSO Policy Advisor *>>> >>> joke.braeken@icann.org <joke.braeken@icann.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> *>>> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO-5Btwi... >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwM...> >>> >>> *>>> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_&d=DwI... >>> ccnso/[facebook.com] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_...> >>> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org-5Bccnso.... >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org_&d=DwMFA...> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> >>> >>> *MK> _______________________________________________ MK> >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *MK> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> MK> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *-- Saludos, Dietmar Content-Type: text/plain; >>> charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: >>> inline X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: >>> 1;MWHPR03MB2718;27:YWDqnEPXx/CS7utzz6td9Qa3koj9je2Sjv9LFnursD0J2VA30AdYQS9BENOC1oqUgmoT+mzlFx7ydYsubIRVesT4Y1jhb3iYxs4FdjVwmhiKOJ9o59lZBh7cDwAsDaB/ >>> X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery: >>> ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095); >>> _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds>* >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >>> >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carolina Caeiro >>> >>> *Coordinadora de Proyectos de Desarrollo* >>> Coordinator of Development Projects >>> >>> *www.lacnic.net[lacnic.net] >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lacnic.net&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=o7RmJCwXVgbzxpnjhadXFvFU9MXfWgIEKEx7RKKQt7c&s=PVkvf8owDabNeVxQOitYmtIVe2X_nDxWaySYhlqqj6Y&e=>* >>> * Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry* >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds > > > -- > Ching Chiao > Founder & CEO > Brandma Internet Group > 中域国际集团 > www.brandma.com > > +886.918.211372 || +86.135.2018.7032 || +1.908.4990050 > Beijing . Chengdu . Hangzhou . Hong Kong . Shenzhen. Taipei > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list > Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds