Hi Emily Im good with the report and letter to move the process on to the public comment. Maureen On Mon, 18 May 2020, 10:55 am Vanda Scartezini, <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
Thank you Emily. Finished reading and I am in full agreement with the supplemental report and the letter.
Stay Safe.
*Vanda Scartezini*
*Polo Consultores Associados*
*Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
*01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
*Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253*
*Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 *
*Sorry for any typos. *
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Monday, May 18, 2020 at 10:03 *To: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Deadline 21 May 2020 - CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call
Dear all,
As a reminder, the following deadlines are coming up:
· *Thursday 21 May*: Deadline for members to challenge the Co-Chairs’ designation of the level of consensus on CCWG recommendations (report attached, see details below)
· *Thursday 21 May*: Deadline to submit proposed edits to the draft cover letter to Chartering Organizations, which will accompany the Final Report (draft attached, see details below)
· *Thursday 28 May*: Deadline to submit minority viewpoints (see details below)
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Erika Mann <erika@erikamann.com> *Date: *Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 15:42 *To: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Cc: *Ching Chiao <ching.chiao@gmail.com>, Emily Barabas < emily.barabas@icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] Fwd: Message for Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject: CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]
Dear all,
Thank you to those who participated in the final poll on mechanisms. Please find attached the Final Report reflecting results of the poll (see poll results in excel format here <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126432332/CCWG%20Auction%20...>). With 15 members and 4 participants responding, poll results indicate strong support for mechanism A, followed by mechanism B with the majority of members supporting that the CCWG should recommend two mechanisms. Section 4.7 of the Report and Recommendation #1 have been updated to reflect this result.
Seeing that there were no additional comments on the last revision circulated, the leadership team now considers the Final Report complete. The next step in the process is for the Co-Chairs to make a designation of the level of consensus for the recommendations in the report (see charter <https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter> for details, an excerpt of which is included below). *We believe that the CCWG supports the recommendations in this report by Consensus. Consensus is defined as “a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree.” If you are a member of the CCWG and you disagree with this designation, please respond to the email list no later than **21 May at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).*
*Please note that at this stage, we are not revisiting the substance of the recommendations or asking you to state your positions on specific recommendations. We are requesting a response only if you believe that the consensus designation is incorrect. If you would like to submit a minority viewpoint on the content of the recommendations, you may do so, but this is separate from the consensus call. Minority statements will be due 28 May at 23:59 UTC (21 days from today). Minority statements may be included in an annex to the Final Report or linked from the Final Report to the wiki, depending on the length and number of statements received.*
Please also find attached a draft cover letter to send to the Chartering Organizations with the Final Report. *If you have questions or comments on this draft letter, please send to the* *email list no later than **21 May at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).*
We hope you are all well, take good care and,
kind regards,
Erika and Ching
*Excerpt from the CCWG Charter regarding Consensus Designation:*
*In developing its output, work plan and any other reports, the CCWG shall seek to act by consensus. The chair(s) may make a call for Consensus. If making such a call they should always make reasonable efforts to involve all Chartering Organization appointed Members of the CCWG (or sub-teams, if applicable). The chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each position as having one of the following designations:*
*a)* * Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection*
*b)* * Consensus – a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree*
*In the absence of Full Consensus, the chair(s) should allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) by the Chartering Organization appointed members and these, along with the consensus view, shall be included in the report.*
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.