It sure does .. Thanks a million and apologies for not seeing it before the call .. Kind Regards --Manal From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:29 PM To: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg>; ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - CCWG Auction Proceeds Meeting Thursday 25 May Thanks, Manal, much appreciated. Please find below a response to your question. Best regards, Marika From: "manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>" <manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>> Date: Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 05:30 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>>, "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] RE: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - CCWG Auction Proceeds Meeting Thursday 25 May Many thanks Marika .. Please find attached minor suggestions to the letter .. I know that all bullets are ‘copy’ and ‘paste’ form the agreed diagram, but I had the feeling that, for a first-time reader, a few things might not be clear .. So: - In the introductory paragraph, I tried to clarify where the ‘initial responses’, referenced throughout the letter, come from; - I suggested some edits to bullet point one but I’m flexible; and - For bullet point 2 “Address any charter questions that have been identified requiring a response before commencing the next phase ”, I’m just wondering whether we mean here “questions that haven’t been responded to in the Initial Run Through” or something else? as I understand all questions would require a response before commencing the next phase, right? MK: As part of the approach for dealing with the charter questions, it was noted that some questions will require a response / agreement before the CCWG will be able to make a determination with potential mechanisms to explore further while others will need to be addressed in the context of the mechanism(s) the CCWG decides to explore further. For example, the question concerning the overall objective of fund allocation has been identified as one of those questions that needs a response. Similarly, the charter question concerning whether ICANN should oversee the solicitation and evaluation of proposals has been identified as one of the questions that would need to be addressed before considering potential mechanisms as it has a determining factor on which mechanism may be most suitable. Other questions such as overhead and conflict of interest are easier to address one a mechanism(s) has been chosen for further exploration. Does that make sense? Looking forward to our call today .. Kind Regards --Manal From: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:42 PM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - CCWG Auction Proceeds Meeting Thursday 25 May Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Thursday 25 May 14.00 UTC. Note that in relation to item 3, an updated version of the work plan has been included in the annex to reflect the meeting at ICANN59 and the cancellation of the meeting of 22 June. Best regards, Marika Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG – Thursday 25 May at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call 2. Welcome / DOI 3. Input received on letter to chartering organizations concerning work plan and approach for dealing with charter questions (see attached) 4. Initial run through of charter question 4 (see template attached) 5. Initial run through of charter question 6 (see template attached) 6. Initial run through of charter question 8, if time allows (see template attached) 7. Identification of external experts - reminder (see https://community.icann.org/x/DAnfAw[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DAnfAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=OjIUsD3mjOJK16Br3fnNfQyvb3U26vidyZn_DxAYub0&s=1TCOG5yaP5i3QyZywSg74EP2jn0RCR9ibmMS6F0w2Nw&e=>) 8. Confirm next meeting – 8 June at 14.00 UTC (Note, this meeting is followed by a meeting on 15 June during which Xavier Calvez will provide a briefing on audit requirements. The meeting on 22 June will be cancelled due to its proximity to ICANN59) Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.