I guess you should Marc. Conflict of Interest is also some self committed to not make any proposal in self benefit. It is a question of Ethics and We bet on yours. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marc Gauw <marc.gauw@nlnet.nl<mailto:marc.gauw@nlnet.nl>> Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 18:36 To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP Ok, well, after all those warm words, l'll take the bet and continue :-) Op 5 sep. 2017 om 19:28 heeft Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org<mailto:evan@telly.org>> het volgende geschreven: I join those suggesting that Marc reconsider resigning. This is ICANN, where there is effectively no such thing as conflict of interest so long as you declare. Were ICANN institutionally to have real concerns about CofI, many PDPs would be nearly barren of membership and the RAAs would look ... very different. As a minimum. It is with the acceptance of this reality in mind that I pause to consider why the Board chooses this as the place to make a stand about “Was this decision taken without conflict of interest?”. That says more about the Board's attitude to this WG than the interests of our membership. - Evan _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds