Dear all, as marika is in vacation period I am copying gnus-secs. My thoughts ref. reordering Even if not considering as priority I believe we all agreed to separate an amount as reserve for ICANN. May be this shall be part as the reasonable before this distribution. Anyway I may considering this is something we have already agreed. Related to the reordering, as my view regarding Open internet , because this title can go too far into issues out of the ICANN’s mission, I would reorganize focus priority on "benefit capacity building…" but also with closer focus than the list of examples under this group. Other priorities have my entire support. Best regards Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 17:52 To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Fwd: For your review - Objective/priorities & examples mind map Reminder - please share your comments / feedback with the mailing list ahead of the next meeting. Also, please read 'reserve fund' instead of auction proceeds in the third bullet point in the message below :-) Best regards, Marika Begin forwarded message: From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: 07 August 2017 at 10:32:01 GMT+2 To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - Objective/priorities & examples mind map Dear All, Per the discussion during the last CCWG meeting, staff has worked with the co-chairs to develop the attached mind map which aims to regroup the objectives based on the survey results as well as the subsequent discussions. Note that: * As a result of this regrouping some objectives have been excluded as specific priorities but one could envision how projects that may focus on some of those areas could also fit within the current identified objective and priorities. * The mind map flags that further work will be needed to define or explain the term ‘Open Internet’. * As a number of you indicated in response to the survey, the topic of auction proceeds cannot be considered as an objective of fund allocation and as such will need to be considered separately. It will be up to the CCWG to determine whether that is a discussion that needs to be held now or whether it can be parked for a later date. * The mind map also aims to cluster a number of examples along the lines of the objective & priorities identified that have been suggested in response to the survey that seem to provide sufficient detail to allow for an evaluation of whether or not the proposed example is consistent with ICANN’s mission. Note that this evaluation will still need to take place. You are encouraged to provide your feedback on the proposed regrouping of objectives/priorities as well as the clustering of examples ahead of the next meeting of the CCWG which has been scheduled for Thursday 10 August at 14.00 UTC. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.