Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism
Are we going to just ignore the input from people who actually run such grant making organizations @Sylvia Cadena<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> has weighed in on this with some factual statements that we seem to have just glossed over?
I am a trustee of the Internet Society, where we have recently set up an actual captive grant making foundation with no appeal process, so no, we are not. It's a bad idea. R's, John
At 16/08/2019 09:46 PM, John R Levine wrote:
Are we going to just ignore the input from people who actually run such grant making organizations @Sylvia Cadena<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> has weighed in on this with some factual statements that we seem to have just glossed over?
I am a trustee of the Internet Society, where we have recently set up an actual captive grant making foundation with no appeal process, so no, we are not. It's a bad idea.
R's, John _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Alan Greenberg -
John R Levine