For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism
Dear CCWG, Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Hi Marika Re: Section 2 - I think that as part of this high level set of expectations, we should include some specific examples (as has already been given, but as a list) to demonstrate what could be appropriate reasons for an appeal so that applicants understand that the appeal process is only about the process undertaken and NOT the decision Re: Section 3 - It would also be appropriate to impose a time limit on the feedback to the applicant so that they are not waiting around for a response. Maureen On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:51 AM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear CCWG,
Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks Marika for sharing this. It is very unusual that non-profit grants program offer an appeal mechanism. As I mentioned before, I do not recommend it. It is hard enough to be able to provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants. It puts into question the decisions of the selection panel, and expose the individuals volunteering there considerably. Incorporating an appeal mechanism requires very detailed procedures, and designing that will require a lot of work. I do not agree to include this as a recommendation from the CCWG, maybe better to include it as a suggestion for the implementation phase to actually fleshed the whole process and provide the details, if it is something the rest of the group is really passionate about. Here is an example of an appeal mechanism, and what it entails. The size of the grants could be one of the indicators to determine if it is worth the effort and the expense. In the case of this fund, each grant is larger than the whole auction proceeds funds we are discussing, and this is for governments receiving the grants (not small, medium applicants). https://www.who.int/hdp/publications/13i.pdf Regards, Sylvia ________________________________________________________________________ Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net | http://www.apnic.foundation ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 | http://www.isif.asia | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia | 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 2:51 am To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism Dear CCWG, Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Dear All, I agree with Sylvia's comments. Since this is a grant, I think feedback to the unsuccessful applicant(s) is good enough and as Sylvia rightly stated, could be hard, no matter the mechanism that is finally adopted. I also agree with her that the quantum of funds is too small for such an elaborate process with the attendant costs and time resources. I think we should recommend a clear application and inclusive feedback process without complications or subject to multiple interpretations. (No fine prints) Mary Uduma On Friday, August 16, 2019, 03:30:08 AM GMT+1, Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> wrote: #yiv9050494131 #yiv9050494131 -- _filtered #yiv9050494131 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9050494131 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv9050494131 #yiv9050494131 p.yiv9050494131MsoNormal, #yiv9050494131 li.yiv9050494131MsoNormal, #yiv9050494131 div.yiv9050494131MsoNormal {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv9050494131 a:link, #yiv9050494131 span.yiv9050494131MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9050494131 a:visited, #yiv9050494131 span.yiv9050494131MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9050494131 p.yiv9050494131msonormal0, #yiv9050494131 li.yiv9050494131msonormal0, #yiv9050494131 div.yiv9050494131msonormal0 {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv9050494131 span.yiv9050494131EmailStyle18 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv9050494131 span.yiv9050494131EmailStyle19 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv9050494131 .yiv9050494131MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv9050494131 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv9050494131 div.yiv9050494131WordSection1 {}#yiv9050494131 Thanks Marika for sharing this. It is very unusual that non-profit grants program offer an appeal mechanism. As I mentioned before, I do not recommend it. It is hard enough to be able to provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants. It puts into question the decisions of the selection panel, and expose the individuals volunteering there considerably. Incorporating an appeal mechanism requires very detailed procedures, and designing that will require a lot of work. I do not agree to include this as a recommendation from the CCWG, maybe better to include it as a suggestion for the implementation phase to actually fleshed the whole process and provide the details, if it is something the rest of the group is really passionate about. Here is an example of an appeal mechanism, and what it entails. The size of the grants could be one of the indicators to determine if it is worth the effort and the expense. In the case of this fund, each grant is larger than the whole auction proceeds funds we are discussing, and this is for governments receiving the grants (not small, medium applicants). https://www.who.int/hdp/publications/13i.pdf Regards, Sylvia ________________________________________________________________________ Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net |http://www.apnic.foundation ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 |http://www.isif.asia | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia | 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From:Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 2:51 am To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism Dear CCWG, Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I have been doing some research as well regarding "appeal mechanisms", and I was struck as I read the suggested process, that we are proposing too many layers, and ... well, a bureaucratic process. Perhaps we recommend a much "lighter" process. As Sylvia and Mary are suggesting. Have a timeline for: Notice of decision And Why the grant was not approved. [avoid use of term - rejected] Be clear on the website of the "mechanism", and in all correspondence [approved by independent legal] that there is not an appeal mechanism. And be sure that there is no indication of a "right" to receive funding, so we avoid litigation issues. Keep this separate from ICANN processes so no one is confused that the ICANN appeal processes can be utilized. M ________________________________ From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mary Uduma via Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 2:12 AM To: ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>; Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism Dear All, I agree with Sylvia's comments. Since this is a grant, I think feedback to the unsuccessful applicant(s) is good enough and as Sylvia rightly stated, could be hard, no matter the mechanism that is finally adopted. I also agree with her that the quantum of funds is too small for such an elaborate process with the attendant costs and time resources. I think we should recommend a clear application and inclusive feedback process without complications or subject to multiple interpretations. (No fine prints) Mary Uduma On Friday, August 16, 2019, 03:30:08 AM GMT+1, Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> wrote: Thanks Marika for sharing this. It is very unusual that non-profit grants program offer an appeal mechanism. As I mentioned before, I do not recommend it. It is hard enough to be able to provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants. It puts into question the decisions of the selection panel, and expose the individuals volunteering there considerably. Incorporating an appeal mechanism requires very detailed procedures, and designing that will require a lot of work. I do not agree to include this as a recommendation from the CCWG, maybe better to include it as a suggestion for the implementation phase to actually fleshed the whole process and provide the details, if it is something the rest of the group is really passionate about. Here is an example of an appeal mechanism, and what it entails. The size of the grants could be one of the indicators to determine if it is worth the effort and the expense. In the case of this fund, each grant is larger than the whole auction proceeds funds we are discussing, and this is for governments receiving the grants (not small, medium applicants). https://www.who.int/hdp/publications/13i.pdf<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.who.int%2Fhdp%2Fpublications%2F13i.pdf&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504267232&sdata=%2FzLJCGc8RpEHROxU1BFUoj9h7fTnYJOKH0JEon4Wbm4%3D&reserved=0> Regards, Sylvia ________________________________________________________________________ Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net | http://www.apnic.foundation<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.foundation&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504277243&sdata=0Mv2j2980nXauXTzl1O8JATFwE8gHvN%2FgICvfy%2FTPlg%3D&reserved=0> ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 | http://www.isif.asia<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.isif.asia&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504287243&sdata=%2BshEezD7yqwOKJP1E48x6JQbAA9mPz9rdmcMQZwBgiw%3D&reserved=0> | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia | 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 * Love trees. Print only if necessary. From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 2:51 am To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism Dear CCWG, Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flearn.icann...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann....>. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccwg-auctionproceeds&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504317270&sdata=%2Fq3ofGXzFmOUOXM9LPeysfDcmYUyChI%2Fh1CJVEkR%2BV8%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Fpolicy&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504327275&sdata=PwOYgH%2BtVR1v9lFlwntwp6PCs7XBpnLX8LVWYgaKczA%3D&reserved=0>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Ftos&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf3b7513f469249275b5008d72210b7ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637015327504337287&sdata=0ofkCrtZNoi3WbignCAq1IpX8jErlYW1atpnMCFZex8%3D&reserved=0>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I believe that we should still have an appeals process just in case - with a much lighter touch and being very clear what the process addresses On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:17 AM Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have been doing some research as well regarding "appeal mechanisms", and I was struck as I read the suggested process, that we are proposing too many layers, and ... well, a bureaucratic process.
Perhaps we recommend a much "lighter" process. As Sylvia and Mary are suggesting.
Have a timeline for: Notice of decision And Why the grant was not approved. [avoid use of term - rejected]
Be clear on the website of the "mechanism", and in all correspondence [approved by independent legal] that there is not an appeal mechanism. And be sure that there is no indication of a "right" to receive funding, so we avoid litigation issues. Keep this separate from ICANN processes so no one is confused that the ICANN appeal processes can be utilized.
M ------------------------------ *From:* Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mary Uduma via Ccwg-auctionproceeds < ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Sent:* Friday, August 16, 2019 2:12 AM *To:* ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>; Sylvia Cadena <sylvia@apnic.net> *Subject:* Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism
Dear All,
I agree with Sylvia's comments.
Since this is a grant, I think feedback to the unsuccessful applicant(s) is good enough and as Sylvia rightly stated, could be hard, no matter the mechanism that is finally adopted.
I also agree with her that the quantum of funds is too small for such an elaborate process with the attendant costs and time resources.
I think we should recommend a clear application and inclusive feedback process without complications or subject to multiple interpretations. (No fine prints)
Mary Uduma
On Friday, August 16, 2019, 03:30:08 AM GMT+1, Sylvia Cadena < sylvia@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks Marika for sharing this.
It is very unusual that non-profit grants program offer an appeal mechanism. As I mentioned before, I do not recommend it. It is hard enough to be able to provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants. It puts into question the decisions of the selection panel, and expose the individuals volunteering there considerably.
Incorporating an appeal mechanism requires very detailed procedures, and designing that will require a lot of work. I do not agree to include this as a recommendation from the CCWG, maybe better to include it as a suggestion for the implementation phase to actually fleshed the whole process and provide the details, if it is something the rest of the group is really passionate about.
Here is an example of an appeal mechanism, and what it entails. The size of the grants could be one of the indicators to determine if it is worth the effort and the expense. In the case of this fund, each grant is larger than the whole auction proceeds funds we are discussing, and this is for governments receiving the grants (not small, medium applicants).
https://www.who.int/hdp/publications/13i.pdf <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.who.in...>
Regards,
Sylvia
________________________________________________________________________
Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net | http://www.apnic.foundation <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apnic.f...>
ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 | http://www.isif.asia <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.isif.as...> | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia |
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
* Love trees. Print only if necessary.
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 2:51 am *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism
Dear CCWG,
Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flearn.icann...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgnso.icann....>. *
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.o...> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann....>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann....>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hello, Well said Sylvia, I encourage the group not to put in any form of appeal, no matter how light or heavy weight, as it will become a new application process on its own and may open new can of worms including possible legal suit; the grant is not a right :-) The best that should be done is to provide a feedback reference where information provided are critically looked into in other to improve implementation of the mechanism. Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 03:30 Sylvia Cadena, <sylvia@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks Marika for sharing this.
It is very unusual that non-profit grants program offer an appeal mechanism. As I mentioned before, I do not recommend it. It is hard enough to be able to provide feedback to unsuccessful applicants. It puts into question the decisions of the selection panel, and expose the individuals volunteering there considerably.
Incorporating an appeal mechanism requires very detailed procedures, and designing that will require a lot of work. I do not agree to include this as a recommendation from the CCWG, maybe better to include it as a suggestion for the implementation phase to actually fleshed the whole process and provide the details, if it is something the rest of the group is really passionate about.
Here is an example of an appeal mechanism, and what it entails. The size of the grants could be one of the indicators to determine if it is worth the effort and the expense. In the case of this fund, each grant is larger than the whole auction proceeds funds we are discussing, and this is for governments receiving the grants (not small, medium applicants).
https://www.who.int/hdp/publications/13i.pdf
Regards,
Sylvia
________________________________________________________________________
Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia@apnic.net | http://www.apnic.foundation
ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 | http://www.isif.asia | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia |
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
* Love trees. Print only if necessary.
*From: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 2:51 am *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated proposal for individual appeals mechanism
Dear CCWG,
Following on from the last CCWG call and the input received on the individual appeals mechanism, please find attached an updated proposal for your review. Please share any comments, concerns or suggestions you may have in advance of the next CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 21 August.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (7)
-
Judith Hellerstein -
Marika Konings -
Marilyn Cade -
Mary Uduma -
Maureen Hilyard -
Seun Ojedeji -
Sylvia Cadena