Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7
Hello Marika, Thanks for this and it looks great. As to question 4, I think a combination of options 1 and 2 may also be a possible option. I like the fact that the comment box allows to expand on any option selected. Maybe that would address my comment on question 4. On another note, is there a reason we are not including observer/other option?[1] I think the questions are quite general in nature and will be good to hear from them as well. I also see we are not capturing the constituency? Cheers! 1. Missed the face 2 face in jourboug (it skipped as I was right in the ALAC room On Jul 2, 2017 10:37 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote: Dear All, Per the action items from our last meeting, please preview the surveys for charter question #4 and #7 by Wednesday 5 July at the latest. At this stage, you are just requested to review whether the survey and proposed responses align with the different options discussed by the CCWG to date or whether additional ones should be added. The objective is to formally launch the survey on Thursday 6 July to allow for sufficient time for responses prior to our next meeting. - Preview the survey for charter question #4: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=T3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl_ 2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER_2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=T3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl_2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJ...> - Preview the survey for charter question #7: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=TInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852 bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=TInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ...> Note that for both questions, the charter question has been broken into smaller pieces to allow for more detailed input, either as a result of sub-questions that were identified or multiple layers present in the original charter questions. Please share any comments you may have with the list *by Wednesday 5 July* (close of business, wherever you are). Thanks, Marika *Marika Konings* *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) * *Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> * *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO* *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. * _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
Thanks, Seun. If the CCWG would like to solicit broader input from observers or others, it always has the ability to do so via public comment or another means of communication. This survey is intended to assess the views of the CCWG members and participants and as such it is limited to those groups. As affiliation is clear from the SOIs, it was not captured as a separate question, more so as this is just to gather input to help inform the deliberations, not to assess the level of consensus for one option or another. However, if you think it is important to capture this information, it would be easy to add a question to that end. Best regards, Marika From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 16:01 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7 Hello Marika, Thanks for this and it looks great. As to question 4, I think a combination of options 1 and 2 may also be a possible option. I like the fact that the comment box allows to expand on any option selected. Maybe that would address my comment on question 4. On another note, is there a reason we are not including observer/other option?[1] I think the questions are quite general in nature and will be good to hear from them as well. I also see we are not capturing the constituency? Cheers! 1. Missed the face 2 face in jourboug (it skipped as I was right in the ALAC room On Jul 2, 2017 10:37 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Per the action items from our last meeting, please preview the surveys for charter question #4 and #7 by Wednesday 5 July at the latest. At this stage, you are just requested to review whether the survey and proposed responses align with the different options discussed by the CCWG to date or whether additional ones should be added. The objective is to formally launch the survey on Thursday 6 July to allow for sufficient time for responses prior to our next meeting. * Preview the survey for charter question #4: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=T3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl_2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER_2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DT3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl-5F2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER-5F2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=rQ7B5bsq86lv7DdsA0hmCFpoYGb-g4RmsIFopSfPAjI&e=> * Preview the survey for charter question #7: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=TInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DTInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=zb_whCaTNu6y229sgmiHXRCiEZVeJDO_r6GmJ2VlgUA&e=> Note that for both questions, the charter question has been broken into smaller pieces to allow for more detailed input, either as a result of sub-questions that were identified or multiple layers present in the original charter questions. Please share any comments you may have with the list by Wednesday 5 July (close of business, wherever you are). Thanks, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
That is very important, otherwise process might become impossible to manage. ———— ** ISIF Asia call for grants proposals and award nominations is open until 30 August (midnight UTC) www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> - Get started and submit your application! ** Sylvia Cadena | sylvia@apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | +10 GMT Brisbane, Australia | http://www.apnic.foundation<http://www.apnic.foundation/> From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Monday, 3 July 2017 at 6:03 am To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7 Thanks, Seun. If the CCWG would like to solicit broader input from observers or others, it always has the ability to do so via public comment or another means of communication. This survey is intended to assess the views of the CCWG members and participants and as such it is limited to those groups. As affiliation is clear from the SOIs, it was not captured as a separate question, more so as this is just to gather input to help inform the deliberations, not to assess the level of consensus for one option or another. However, if you think it is important to capture this information, it would be easy to add a question to that end. Best regards, Marika From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 16:01 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7 Hello Marika, Thanks for this and it looks great. As to question 4, I think a combination of options 1 and 2 may also be a possible option. I like the fact that the comment box allows to expand on any option selected. Maybe that would address my comment on question 4. On another note, is there a reason we are not including observer/other option?[1] I think the questions are quite general in nature and will be good to hear from them as well. I also see we are not capturing the constituency? Cheers! 1. Missed the face 2 face in jourboug (it skipped as I was right in the ALAC room On Jul 2, 2017 10:37 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Per the action items from our last meeting, please preview the surveys for charter question #4 and #7 by Wednesday 5 July at the latest. At this stage, you are just requested to review whether the survey and proposed responses align with the different options discussed by the CCWG to date or whether additional ones should be added. The objective is to formally launch the survey on Thursday 6 July to allow for sufficient time for responses prior to our next meeting. · Preview the survey for charter question #4: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=T3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl_2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER_2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DT3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl-5F2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER-5F2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=rQ7B5bsq86lv7DdsA0hmCFpoYGb-g4RmsIFopSfPAjI&e=> · Preview the survey for charter question #7: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=TInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DTInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=zb_whCaTNu6y229sgmiHXRCiEZVeJDO_r6GmJ2VlgUA&e=> Note that for both questions, the charter question has been broken into smaller pieces to allow for more detailed input, either as a result of sub-questions that were identified or multiple layers present in the original charter questions. Please share any comments you may have with the list by Wednesday 5 July (close of business, wherever you are). Thanks, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
participants (3)
-
Marika Konings -
Seun Ojedeji -
Sylvia Cadena