Dear Mr. Wang Wei: I am making progress ^-^ and noticed some more errors/changes. ================================================================ Q3 (My previous message RE: MSS --> CCC) ================================================================= Q4. This seems minor too. I notices that CJK compatibility paren was used instead of regular ASCII paren. There were 2 occurrences in one line. I would like to suggest that "）" (CJK compatibility paren) --> ")" (ASCII paren). [ 2 occurrences in one line] 83B5 莵 菟(83DF） 菟(83DF） 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) --> 83B5 莵 菟(83DF) 菟(83DF) 莵(83B5)菟(83DF) ================================================================= Q5: I compared variant groups in C-LGR (2015.04.30.) and vg in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) and noticed some two variant groups (vg) were removed and three new vg are added. I would like to know whether these removals are mistakes or not and whether additions are really intended. 1) [removal] existed in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now missing in C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 1a) < 2 2 (O 5CAB 岫) (O 5CC0 峀): vg ===>
5CAB 岫 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB) 岫(5CAB): indep. char. 5CC0 峀 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0) 峀(5CC0): indep. char.
1b) < 3 2 (O 5999 妙) (X 7385 玅) (O 7AD7 竗): vg of size 3 (3 variants) ===>
5999 妙 妙(5999) 妙(5999) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 7385 玅 妙(5999) 玅(7385) 妙(5999)玅(7385): vg of size 2 7AD7 竗 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) 竗(7AD7) : indep. char.
2) [addition] did NOT exist in C-LGR (2015.04.30.); now added to C-LGR (2016.07.18.) 2a) < 7200 爀 爀(7200) 爀(7200) : indep. char. < 8D6B 赫 赫(8D6B) 赫(8D6B) : indep. char. ===>
2 2 (O 7200 爀) (O 8D6B 赫) : a new vg of size 2
2b) < 757A 畺 畺(757A) 畺(757A) : indep. char. < 7586 疆 疆(7586) 疆(7586) : indep. charf. ===>
2 2 (O 757A 畺) (O 7586 疆) : a new vg. of size 2
2C) < 3960 㥠 㥠(3960) 㥠(3960) : indep. char. < 8ADD 諝 谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 < 8ADD 諝 谞(8C1E) 諝(8ADD) : a vg. of size 2 ===>
3 2 (O 3960 㥠) (O 8ADD 諝) (X 8C1E 谞) : a new vg of size 3
* * * Thanks in advance. KIM, K. ------------------------------- On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Wang Wei:
I seem to have found some minor errors in your C-LGR (2016.07.18.)
In 9 lines (24 occurrences), MSS need be changed to CCC. One sample line is shown below:
5MSS 峌 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) 峌(5MSS) --> 5CCC 峌 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC) 峌(5CCC)
Thanks in advance.
KIM, K.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Prof. Kim
I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL I have re-edited them in the attached document.
Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR.
So please refer the latest version as attached.
Regards WANG Wei
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 收件人: chinesegp@icann.org 抄送: JapaneseGP@icann.org; koreanGP@icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.)
Dear Mr. Wang:
I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12.
I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below.
==================================================== Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors:
--- 1 cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
--- 2 cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A)
--- 3 cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor)
--- 4 cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA)
--- 5 cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
--- 6 cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043)
====================================================== Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it.
Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants.
- Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant).
- However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars):
a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415
Plz correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok _______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok