Dear Mr. Wang Wei: Thanks very much for your quick response. Much progress! I still would like to mention two issues raised earlier. ======================================================= RE: Q1, I mentioned five cases and you corrected 4 cases. It seems that still one more case need be modified. Currently, the file contains the following lines RE: U4443 and U6726
6015 朦(6726); 朦(6726) 䑃(4443) (NOT sorted --> need be modified) 19735 䑃(4443); 䑃(4443) 朦(6726) (sorted, OK)
I would like to suggest that the line be modified as shown below:
6015 朦(6726); 朦(6726) 䑃(4443) (NOT sorted) ===> 6015 朦(6726); 䑃(4443 朦(6726) (sorted)
======================================================= Secondly, you did not answer Q2 that I asked. This is RE: CGP Proposal Draft 20160612.docx Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it.
Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants.
- Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant). - However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars): a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415 Plz correct me if I am wrong. Thanks in advance. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:01 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Prof. Kim
I checked these chars and confirm that there are some coding error/editorial error in the EXCEL I have re-edited them in the attached document.
Also, I excluded the char of 58B5 which is not in MSR.
So please refer the latest version as attached.
Regards WANG Wei
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2016年7月17日 22:26 收件人: chinesegp@icann.org 抄送: JapaneseGP@icann.org; koreanGP@icann.org; KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> 主题: [ChineseGP] comments (1) RE: C-LGR (2016.06.12.)
Dear Mr. Wang:
I started analyzing your variant groups published on 2016.06.12.
I seem to have found some errors and will appreciate if you would check two issues described below.
==================================================== Q1. The following six variant groups seem to have some errors:
--- 1 cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
--- 2 cvg_0: (5AD4) 嬪(5B2A) cvg_0:嫔(5AD4) 嬪(5B2A)
--- 3 cvg_0:䑃(4443) 朦(6726) OOO (sorted) cvg_0:朦(6726) 䑃(4443) XXX (NOT sorted, minor)
--- 4 cvg_0:击(51FB) (6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA) cvg_0:击(51FB) 撃(6483) 擊(64CA)
--- 5 cvg_0: (5378) 缷(7F37) cvg_0:卸(5378) 缷(7F37)
--- 6 cvg_0:沣(6CA3) (7043) cvg_0:沣(6CA3) 灃(7043)
====================================================== Q2. I wonder if the following information RE: 3103 variant groups is correct. I will appreciate if you would check it.
Among 19738 characters, 3103 of them have non-reflexive variant character(s), including 2214 with 1 variant, 545 with 2 variants, 200 with 3 variants, 89 with 4 variants, 36 with 5 variants, 14 with 6 variants, 4 with 7 variants, 1 with 8 variants.
- Based on your info, there should be 3103 variant groups and 12075 independent char (i.e., char with NO variant).
- However, my initial "rough" analysis of <column G, All Variant Mappings> of Appendix C file seems quite different from your numbers (i.e., 3103 var. groups and 12075 indep. chars):
a) # indep. chars: 11684 (<-- your number is 12075), diff = 391 b) # var. groups: 3518 (<-- your number is 3103), diff = 415
Plz correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok _______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok