Dear Yan san, Wang san and all, (I included JapaneseGP and KoreanGP again) Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. I'll respond to Marc's announce with these comments. Regards, -- Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp> On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:17:13 +0800 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Yoneya San.
I think the terminology and algorithm will work not only for CJK, but for all other GP universally.
That’s the core value of the work.
regards
发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代 表 Zhiwei Yan 发送时间: 2015年5月19日 13:40 收件人: Yoshiro YONEYA; ChineseGP 主题: Re: [ChineseGP] New possible IETF work regarding LGR
Thank you for your message, Yoneya San.
I agree with you, the integrated algorithm should be included in this work.
Besides, I also think the terminology-definition is also needed.
2015-05-19
_____
Zhiwei Yan
_____
发件人： Yoshiro YONEYA
发送时间： 2015-05-19 12:22:14
收件人： ChineseGP; KoreanGP; JapaneseGP
抄送：
主题： [ChineseGP] New possible IETF work regarding LGR
Dear Wang Wei san, Kenny Huang san, and all,
Please see following URL which was an announcement of new possible
IETF work regarding LGR.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg14301.html
The scope of this work is to standardize XML schema for LGR (as mentioned).
I think LGR integration algorithm is a related work item to this work.
Any thoughts?
Regards,
--
Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
_______________________________________________
ChineseGP mailing list
ChineseGP@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
.