Dear Mr Wang and members: Since the subject of my previous message was confusing (wrong?), I am sending the message again with subject corrected. Sorry and thanks. Rgds, KIM, K. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:26 PM Subject: Re: 答复: [Japanesegp] 答复: [ChineseGP] K-LGR v0.3 (2015.08.13.) To: 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> Cc: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>, "chinesegp@icann.org" <chinesegp@icann.org>, "JapaneseGP@icann.org" <JapaneseGP@icann.org>, "koreanGP@icann.org" <koreanGP@icann.org> Dear Mr. Wang Wei: On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Yoneya San
Yes, CGP will update it. We will share it around this weekend.
I will really appreciate if CGP would also review and, if needed, accommodate Korea's review when CGP update C-LGR. Korea sent its review result on July 16 and the subject of the message was: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.). I am sending the review result once again in this e-mail. Thanks in advance. Rgds, KIM, K.
Regards Wang Wei
from:KIM Kyongsok<gimgs0@gmail.com> to:Wang Wei <wangwei@cnic.cn>, Kenny Huang <huangksh@gmail.com> date:Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM subject:[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)? Hi, everybody: KLGP is reviewing C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.) and found some possible errors. 1. 618 lines do NOT seem to obey reflexivity (see Appendix 1 for details). 2. In two cases, in addition to reflexivity, there seem symmetry and transitivity issues (problems). 3. Am I missing something? I may be wrong. I am looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks in advance. * BTW, this message was sent about 4 weeks ago to CGP cochairs. Rgds, -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok