Dear all CGP and KGP reached consensus on variant mappings in the CK joint meeting, March, Beijing. After that, CGP participated in the ICANN Helsinki meeting remotely with the help from Edmon CHUNG. According to the discussion between CJK and IP, we generated LGR proposal as attached. The <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=Main&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> Main <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=changes&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> changes <http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=are&FORM=BDVSP6&mkt=zh-cn> are as follows: - Section 3.3 explains the CGP’s attempt to reduce the repertoire, and the reason why CGP decided to keep the current size. - Section 4.2.3 illustrates the inconsistency between CGP and dotAsia. According to the discussion with Edmon CHUNG, dotAsia would adjust its SLD repertoire and variant mappings to comply with CGP LGR rules once finalized. - Section 4.2.4 introduces the coordination outcome between C and K, and the final CJK consensus. - Section 4.3 explains the CGP’s attempt to eliminate the multiple mappings and the reason why CGP decided to keep multiple mappings; alternatively, CGP proposed two solutions to limit the number of allocatable labels for further discussion with the IP. Special thanks for Chris DILLON and QI Chao for the proofread and XML generation. Please feel free to give your comment before I send it to IP next weekend. @Edmon, please advise if the document answers all doubts and concerns from IP. Best Regards WANG Wei