Thursday meeting on 16th April
Dear All I'd like to hold CGP meeting 3PM~4PM Thursday With the help from Mr. QI Chao, we have generated two different repertoire, the original CDNC table (18000+ code points), and a reduced smaller one (13000+ code points) However, compared with JPRS table, the TWO overlapping sets are quite similar. We really need to discuss pros and cons of two different table, and which one should be adopted. Mr. QI, please send out the two EXCEL files of code points to everyone. Thank you! Regards Wang Wei
Dear members， Thank Wang Wei. Here are two excels : zh_in_cdnc_repo.xlsx , 19537 Hanzi which includes all cdnc Hanzi(19520) and HKIRC submit 15 Hanzi (58DC、52A4、52C5、53DA、57D7、5BD7、5FDF、617D、6407、64E1、64E5、661E、6900、6AC8、6C39) , (58B5, 3A5C NOT in MSR). zh_in_reduced_repo.xlsx, 13237 Hanzi. This version is not complete. Not all Hanzi in MSR and Hanzi need to be revised for generating variant groups. Best Regards. Qi chao 发件人： 王伟 发送时间： 2015年4月14日(星期二) 下午10:07 收件人： ChineseGP 主题： [ChineseGP] Thursday meeting on 16th April Dear All I'd like to hold CGP meeting 3PM~4PM Thursday With the help from Mr. QI Chao, we have generated two different repertoire, the original CDNC table (18000+ code points), and a reduced smaller one (13000+ code points) However, compared with JPRS table, the TWO overlapping sets are quite similar. We really need to discuss pros and cons! of two different table, and which one should be adopted. Mr. QI, please send out the two EXCEL files of code points to everyone. Thank you! Regards Wang Wei
Dear Members The second excel of ‘zh_in_reduced_repo.xlsx’ is a full collection of three parts : IICore, Normalized Hanzi Table (in Mainland) and TW/HK/CN registered Hanzi. It is not finished yet, pending on lidu,strokes/radicals treatment, as well as revise for the feed back from TW and HK. Thank Professor Zhang for your comment and correction. Regards Qichao via foxmail 发件人： 齐超 发送时间： 2015年4月15日(星期三) 上午11:45 收件人： wangwei; ChineseGP@icann.org 主题： [ChineseGP]回复: Thursday meeting on 16th April Dear members， Thank Wang Wei. Here are two excels : zh_in_cdnc_repo.xlsx , 19537 Hanzi which includes all cdnc Hanzi(19520) and HKIRC submit 15 Hanzi (58DC、52A4、52C5、53DA、57D7、5BD7、5FDF、617D、6407、64E1、64E5、661E、6900、6AC8、6C39) , (58B5, 3A5C NOT in MSR). zh_in_reduced_repo.xlsx, 13237 Hanzi. This version is not complete. Not all Hanzi in MSR and Hanzi need to be revised for generating variant groups. Best Regards. Qi chao 发件人： 王伟 发送时间： 2015年4月14日(星期二) 下午10:07 收件人： ChineseGP 主题： [ChineseGP] Thursday meeting on 16th April Dear All I'd like to hold CGP meeting 3PM~4PM Thursday With the help from Mr. QI Chao, we have generated two different repertoire, the original CDNC table (18000+ code points), and a reduced smaller one (13000+ code points) However, compared with JPRS table, the TWO overlapping sets are quite similar. We really need to discuss pros and cons! of two different table, and which one should be adopted. Mr. QI, please send out the two EXCEL files of code points to everyone. Thank you! Regards Wang Wei
Dear All， Because many codepoints in the Normalized Hanzi Table are not in MSR, so I update the second excel except Normalized Hanzi. The attachments are two excels : cdnc_jp_repo.xlsx , 19535 Hanzi which includes all cdnc Hanzi(19520) and HKIRC submit 15 Hanzi (58DC、52A4、52C5、53DA、57D7、5BD7、5FDF、617D、6407、64E1、64E5、661E、6900、6AC8、6C39) , (58B5, 3A5C NOT in MSR). There are 6181 codepoints overlapped with JPRS table. For the cdnc variant is ready, so variants to the codepoint are listed in excel. reduced_jp_repo.xlsx, reduced to 10590 Hanzi except for the Normalized Hanzi Table, includes IICore and CN/TW/HK registered Hanzi. There are 5765 codepoints overlapped . And note that some Hanzi except those in cdnc tables need to be defined to variant groups. Hope them to help CGP. Best Regards. 齐超 via foxmail 发件人： 王伟 发送时间： 2015年4月14日(星期二) 下午10:07 收件人： ChineseGP 主题： [ChineseGP] Thursday meeting on 16th April Dear All I'd like to hold CGP meeting 3PM~4PM Thursday With the help from Mr. QI Chao, we have generated two different repertoire, the original CDNC table (18000+ code points), and a reduced smaller one (13000+ code points) However, compared with JPRS table, the TWO overlapping sets are quite similar. We really need to discuss pros and cons! of two different table, and which one should be adopted. Mr. QI, please send out the two EXCEL files of code points to everyone. Thank you! Regards Wang Wei
participants (2)
-
王伟 -
齐超