Dear all, It seems to me that the CGP repertoire is expanding, even no one suggests to remove something from the MSR-1. Actually, the content of the MSR-1, Han Repertoire really need being carefully reviewed , in my view, at least the following issues be discussed: 1. The obsolete Korean LIdu have proved no longer used, They should be removed from the CGP repertoire. Such as 乤、乥、兯、兺, about 80 characters in CDNC 2. The Han Radicals /Strokes that are not regarded as independent Hanzi, （不成字的部首或笔画）should not be included in CGP Repertoire. such as丬、丿、乚、乛. 3. Concerning a few CJK B characters, I think we need to carefully check: a) If they really probably be used in TOP level domain name ? b) What’s their usage frequency if available ? c) Is there really any application needing such characters as domain name ? d) From technical side, CJK B causes data type major change , registrars should evaluate the impact (to variant complexity and font support problem ) and is it worth to make such change in the near future. Regards, Zhang
Dear Prof. Zhang and CGP members I have proposed to CDNC chair that we set up a session in CDNC & CGP joint meeting in Shanghai, 30th, discussing the inclusion & exclusion of LIdu and Radicals/Strokes. Before we reached a final agreement on that, I listed Prof. Zhang’s suggestions in the current principles as the attached file. With this file, Kenny and I will interact with IP, KGP and JGP. Does it work for everyone? Wang Wei 发件人: Joe Zhang [mailto:joe.zhang@unihan.com.cn] 发送时间: 2014年5月5日 11:13 收件人: 'Wang Wei'; 'Jonathan Shea'; 'Dillon, Chris' 抄送: ChineseGP@icann.org 主题: Inclusion & Exclusion Principles 重要性: 高 Dear all, It seems to me that the CGP repertoire is expanding, even no one suggests to remove something from the MSR-1. Actually, the content of the MSR-1, Han Repertoire really need being carefully reviewed , in my view, at least the following issues be discussed: 1. The obsolete Korean LIdu have proved no longer used, They should be removed from the CGP repertoire. Such as 乤、乥、兯、兺, about 80 characters in CDNC 2. The Han Radicals /Strokes that are not regarded as independent Hanzi, （不成字的部首或笔画）should not be included in CGP Repertoire. such as丬、丿、乚、乛. 3. Concerning a few CJK B characters, I think we need to carefully check: a) If they really probably be used in TOP level domain name ? b) What’s their usage frequency if available ? c) Is there really any application needing such characters as domain name ? d) From technical side, CJK B causes data type major change , registrars should evaluate the impact (to variant complexity and font support problem ) and is it worth to make such change in the near future. Regards, Zhang
participants (2)
-
Joe Zhang -
Wang Wei