I totally agree with Cléments statement below. Also keep in mind that if they increase the price of these domains, they will start increasing the prices of all the other domains as well, it is only a matter of time. Domains are pure profit, its just a digital product being transferred online with little costs. Although this TLD has not had the expected success, I find it abnormal that a holder of such a domain name experiences an incomprehensible increase. The increase of this TLD, reserved for the commercial sector, risks sending a bad signal to the business world. Historical gTLDs benefit from a certain framework, which encourages registrars to promote this type of extension. Deregulating these gTLDs so that they become like ngTLDs will not benefit anyone except registry managers for one or two years. The outstanding results of.COM over other extensions, see Verisign DNIB, is a weak signal that the community must accept and interpret. The lack of a framework for gTLD pricing policies has led to some disappointments, as evidenced by the reactions of registrars when Uniregistry significantly increased its prices on its extensions. Similarly, the « Dot Chinese Online » has increased its prices by 25 since 15 March 2019. The market is not ready for significant price fluctuations on underutilized TLDs. The .BIZ, used by many companies and individuals, is also not ready for such developments. An entrepreneur who has registered his domain name cannot tomorrow see a multiplication per cent of the selling price of his .BIZ. While Europe is implementing a charter of good practices for online platforms, the "Platform to business" project, it would be interesting to develop such a policy for ICANN's gTLDs in order to frame tariff increases in an assessment to be defined. Johnny Gyorke The host of The Power Of Your Voice Podcast! <http://thepowerofyourvoice.com/> http://ThePowerOfYourVoice.com Follow On Instagram @voicepodcast The Power Of Your Voice is on Apple Podcast, Google Play, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn and YouTube